May SJCC

Junior Men's Épée

Sunday, May 18, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Reno-Sparks Convention Center - Reno, NV, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 57%
2 MANN Jake R. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 54%
3 DAVOODIAN Christopher 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 50%
3 NORMILE Nicholas 100% 100% 94% 72% 35% 7%
5 ROMANOV Ethan 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 27%
6 LEE Stewart S. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 33%
7 LOISEAU Eliott 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 38% 9%
8 SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN 100% 100% 97% 85% 55% 20% 3%
9 KIM Jayden 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 23% 4%
10 ROBINSON Samuel 100% 100% 94% 73% 36% 8%
11 KUGLER Luke 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 20%
12 WU Jonathan 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 40%
13 SAVORETTI Francesco 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 47% 11%
14 LIU Yueri 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 12%
15 CHEN Leonardo 100% 100% 99% 90% 64% 24%
16 LAI Boden 100% 100% 99% 90% 61% 20%
17 SEEFELDT William Henry C. 100% 99% 90% 62% 25% 4%
18 WONG Baron 100% 100% 97% 79% 43% 10%
19 LIU Adam 100% 100% 98% 85% 56% 21% 3%
20 PARKER Isaiah 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 21% 3%
21 JAIN Samyak 100% 99% 90% 60% 23% 4%
22 HUANG Kenneth 100% 100% 97% 79% 42% 12% 1%
23 KIM Sullivan 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 55%
24 SAVORETTI Pietro 100% 98% 84% 53% 20% 4% -
25 HAMZA Tudor 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 15%
26 CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) 100% 99% 92% 66% 27% 5%
27 DOUBOV Andrew 100% 100% 98% 85% 54% 20% 3%
28 CHOI Kaiden I. 100% 100% 98% 85% 52% 16%
29 LEE JoonWon 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 45% 11%
30 XIA Dashan 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 17%
31 MIZRAHI Michael 100% 100% 97% 79% 44% 14% 2%
32 TANG William 100% 100% 98% 88% 60% 23% 3%
33 FU Leon 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 43%
34 GUMEDELLI Mohnish 100% 99% 87% 56% 22% 5% < 1%
35 CARRIER Gabriel A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 59%
36 ERLIKHMAN Adrian 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 31% 6%
37 CHEN Brian 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 17%
38 LO Jake 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 36%
39 GINZBURG Adam 100% 100% 99% 95% 76% 40% 9%
40 PAK Elliot 100% 100% 97% 80% 43% 9%
41 CHOI Zachary 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 19%
42 SONG Troy 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 35% 8%
43 TSE Maxwell 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 36% 7%
44 TRAN Spencer 100% 100% 97% 85% 53% 18% 2%
45 CHEN YiHeng 100% 99% 92% 69% 33% 8% 1%
46 DANIELS Jonah 100% 100% 97% 84% 52% 18% 2%
47 KIM Gene 100% 99% 90% 64% 29% 7% -
48 ZHU Eric 100% 99% 92% 68% 33% 8% 1%
49 YAO Geoffrey B. 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 20%
50 LI Yunji (Rain) 100% 98% 81% 44% 12% 1%
51 MUENKE Magnus 100% 97% 81% 48% 16% 2%
52 LEE Aiden 100% 99% 91% 67% 31% 7% 1%
53 YU Austin 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 19% 2%
54 LU Jacob 100% 100% 98% 82% 46% 13% 1%
55 LI Tristan 100% 98% 82% 48% 16% 3% -
56 HE Zhiheng 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 33% 7%
56 ALI Farhan 100% 100% 95% 77% 43% 13% 1%
58 TIEN Jabin 100% 100% 100% 95% 79% 45% 12%
59 MEHROTRA Neel 100% 99% 93% 71% 36% 9% 1%
60 MCDOWELL Will 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 21% 3%
61 MCLAREN Mason 100% 90% 47% 13% 2% - -
62 WANG Jason 100% 88% 54% 20% 4% - -
63 WU Alistair 100% 100% 97% 83% 53% 20% 3%
64 KIM Alexander 100% 75% 34% 8% 1% -
65 LIU Yikun 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 33% 7%
66 WANG justin 100% 100% 100% 95% 78% 41% 9%
67 WANG Joey 100% 100% 99% 91% 68% 33% 7%
68 TIKHOMIROV Theodore 100% 100% 98% 84% 48% 9%
69 LI Timothy 100% 92% 63% 26% 6% 1% -
70 KHANNA Nikhil 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 30%
71 LEE Aiden 100% 100% 96% 77% 43% 14% 2%
72 LOUIE Joseph 100% 93% 64% 25% 4% -
73 LEE Royce 100% 95% 74% 38% 11% 1%
74 XIE Brandon 100% 99% 88% 60% 25% 4%
75 SANTOS Antonio K. 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 23% 3%
76 BORISENKO Samuel 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 20% 3%
77 HU Robert J. 100% 100% 98% 88% 60% 24% 3%
78 CHANG Andrew 100% 98% 85% 53% 19% 4% -
79 SIM Ian 100% 100% 92% 65% 30% 8% 1%
80 WONG King-Yee 100% 100% 95% 75% 41% 13% 2%
82 SIEDOW William 100% 98% 83% 51% 19% 3% -
83 LI Ray 100% 82% 43% 13% 2% - -
84 LI Grayson 100% 83% 46% 15% 3% - -
85 AGGELER Donovan 100% 99% 88% 59% 24% 5% -
86 WANG Devin 100% 84% 47% 15% 3% - -
87 WU Steven 100% 98% 83% 50% 18% 3%
88 GLOGOWSKI Konrad 100% 98% 84% 50% 16% 2%
89 WU Johnny y. 100% 97% 78% 41% 11% 1%
90 SEBASTIAN Alexander P. 100% 99% 87% 56% 21% 3%
91 LI Ethan R. 100% 93% 65% 27% 6% 1%
92 YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki 100% 96% 73% 34% 7% -
93 LEE Jayden J. 100% 99% 90% 63% 28% 7% 1%
94 EMMERT JP 100% 94% 69% 32% 8% 1% -
95 HE Bronto 100% 77% 38% 10% 2% - -
96 KIM Remington 100% 71% 28% 6% 1% - -
97 PARK Sangwook 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 14% 1%
98 SUH Aiden 100% 87% 49% 16% 3% - -
99 ZHANG Luqi 100% 62% 21% 4% - - -
100 SU Samuel 100% 83% 45% 14% 2% - -
101 DEVINENI Avyang 100% 86% 49% 16% 3% - -
102 MIAO Quentin 100% 100% 92% 64% 26% 4%
103 PARKE Nathaniel 100% 62% 20% 3% - -
104 PAN Anthony 100% 87% 50% 16% 2% -
104 DACHELET Sawyer 100% 74% 31% 7% 1% -
106 PIVOVAROV Lucas 100% 89% 52% 16% 3% -
107 SANTOS Francisco M. 100% 93% 65% 28% 6% 1%
108 LEE DoWon 100% 92% 60% 23% 5% -
109 LIN Andrew 100% 67% 24% 4% - -
110 LOISEAU Oscar 100% 99% 91% 66% 31% 8% 1%
111 LIN Jason 100% 60% 13% 1% - - -
112 AHMED Mohsen 100% 99% 92% 67% 32% 8% 1%
113 LESCURE Dimitri 100% 100% 97% 76% 38% 10% 1%
114 HOWARD Jackson 100% 98% 85% 54% 20% 4% -
115 KE Sebastian 100% 93% 66% 30% 8% 1% -
115 HERDMAN Julian 100% 94% 68% 31% 7% 1% -
117 MOLLINIER Angel 100% 88% 45% 12% 2% - -
117 ZHANG Austin 100% 80% 39% 11% 1% - -
119 GUO Woody 100% 85% 48% 16% 3% - -
120 VOO Lucas 100% 81% 41% 12% 2% - -
121 LEE Jake (JiYuen) 100% 97% 71% 31% 7% 1%
122 HERNDON Liam 100% 99% 90% 59% 24% 5% -
122 GUO Luke 100% 68% 19% 2% - - -
124 LIU Max 100% 46% 9% 1% - - -
125 LEE Anton 100% 86% 50% 17% 3% - -
126 WANG-SONG Evan 100% 83% 44% 13% 2% - -
127 CHAKRABORTY Zorian 100% 95% 71% 34% 9% 1% -
128 GANESH Maxen 100% 79% 40% 12% 2% -
129 DAO Alexander 100% 97% 76% 37% 8% 1%
130 GADHVI Darius 100% 58% 16% 2% - -
131 KOU Mason 100% 33% 4% - - - -
132 SONG Jonathan 100% 16% 1% - - - -
133 LIGHT Luke 100% 76% 34% 9% 1% - -
134 OLIVAS Joseph 100% 30% 4% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.