San Diego, CA - San Diego, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | V V V V D V | V V V V V V | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 2 | MOSES Alexander | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 3 | RANGEL Arturo | V V D V D V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 5 | LEE Alexander G. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 6 | HWANG Samuel W. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 7 | SHARMA Sanil | V V V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 8 | JIN Nicholas | V V V D V | V V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 9 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 10 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 11 | WONG Daniel | D V V V D V | V V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 12 | POCSVEILER Magor | V V D D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 13 | SINGHA Orion | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 14 | BURKE Spencer W. | V V V D D | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 15 | GILLISON Edward L. | V D V D V D | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 16 | KIM Darius H. | D V D D D D | V V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 17 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | V V V V V V | V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 18 | THOMPSON Chester | V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 19 | PRASAD Ankith | V D V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 20 | BAZHENOV Anthony | V D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 21 | MOHEBI Saam | D V V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 22 | LIN Kyran | V D D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 23 | JIN daniel | V D V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 24 | GYURE Brayden H. | V D V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 25 | MENDOZA Zachari | V V V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 26 | ZHU Max | V D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 27 | HUSSAIN Kamran | V D V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 28 | DIECK Logan O. | V V V D D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 29 | DRIBIN Ezra | V D V V D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 30 | LIANG Aaron | V V D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 31 | SIVAGAR Leo | V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 32 | CHOI Isaac | D D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 33 | JAIN Aditya | V V V V V D | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 34 | NOEL Sebastien A. | V D V V V D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 35 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | V D D D V V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 36 | MATTIS George | D D D V V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 37 | USHER Alexander | D D V D V V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 38 | AHN Gus | V V V D D D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 39 | XU Alex | D D V V V D | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 40 | WRIGHT Christopher | V V V D D D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 41 | MARQUEZ ALDANA EThan Gabriel | V D V D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 43 | CHU Anthony | D V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 44 | MILEY Nick N. | D V D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 45 | PAI Nandan K. | D D V D V D | D | 0.4 | 2 | +1.6 |
| 46 | FEES HOLDEN | V D V D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 47 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | D V D D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 48 | BAGCHI Aritra | D D D V D V | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 49 | WESTON Tom | D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 50 | WANG DEVON | D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 51 | SEWELL Jacob | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 52 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 53 | CORDOVA-CHAVARRY Alejandro | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 54 | KIM Sullivan | D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 55 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | D V D D D D | D | 4.2 | 1 | -3.2 |
| 56 | LIU Kirk D. | D D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 57 | YEH Preston | D D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 58 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | D D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 59 | PARK Elliot | D D D D D V | D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
| 60 | WONG Nathan | D D D D D D | D | 3.8 | 0 | -3.8 |
| 61 | CHU Allan | D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 62 | DRIBIN Zev | D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 63 | NIKOLOV Peter | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 64 | CROSSMAN Brandon | D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 65 | ZHANG Alec | D D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.