San Diego, CA - San Diego, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% | |
| 2 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 3 | PRASAD Ankith | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% |
| 3 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | |
| 5 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 25% | |
| 6 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 48% | |
| 7 | WRIGHT Christopher | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 13% | ||
| 8 | DRIBIN Ezra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% | 2% |
| 9 | NOEL Sebastien A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 13% | |
| 10 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 99% | 82% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 11 | BAGCHI Aritra | 100% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 12 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 27% | |
| 13 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 14 | JIN daniel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
| 15 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% | ||
| 16 | NIKOLOV Peter | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 17 | PARK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 6% | |
| 18 | CHU Allan | 100% | 99% | 84% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
| 19 | ZHANG Alec | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 12% | 1% | |
| 20 | MCDONALD Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
| 21 | GAITHER Christopher W. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 7% | ||
| 22 | ZHANG Yuelin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
| 23 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | 100% | 97% | 73% | 32% | 6% | ||
| 24 | THOMAS Michael | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 14% | 1% | |
| 26 | EVANS noah | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | |
| 27 | GUPTA-GARCIA Raj | 100% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 28 | SHA Michael | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | GREGSTON Layland | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 8% | - |
| 31 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | HIGGINS Branford | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
| 33 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 6% | |
| 34 | CASASSOVICI Georges | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 15% | 1% | |
| 35 | MITTLER Frederick | 100% | 86% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | WANG owen | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | MENDOZA Zander | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
| 38 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 39 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | ||
| 40 | RAINEY Daniel | 100% | 77% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 41 | PHUKAN Rohin | 100% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.