Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DODIN David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% | |
2 | KATS Dylan G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% |
3 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% |
3 | TIYA BIAYA K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | |
5 | LEE inwoo | 100% | 99% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
6 | IARIKOV Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
7 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% | |
8 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
9 | SHCHUR Landon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
10 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
11 | SKORUPAN Grant | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
12 | SILVERS Ari | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
13 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 21% |
14 | ZHENG Andy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% |
15 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% | |
16 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
17 | MULCAHY Olaf | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% |
18 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | |
19 | LOISEAU Eliott | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 38% | 9% |
20 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 16% |
21 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 25% |
22 | PARK Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 10% |
23 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 1% |
24 | NAKAS Levent | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 30% | 5% |
25 | CHIN Dylan A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
25 | HEADRICK Lance | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
27 | KENT V David | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
28 | LO Jake | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
29 | KARNAS Karol | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 3% | |
30 | RIPA Joseph K. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
31 | HERNDON Liam | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
32 | SONG Troy | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
33 | LAI Boden | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
34 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
35 | MALHAM Andrew | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | - |
36 | SINGH Ravin | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
37 | MILLER Quinlan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 5% | |
38 | VRAPI Dorian A. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
39 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
40 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | - | |
41 | YU Austin | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
42 | GINZBURG Adam | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
43 | FENG shang | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
44 | ZHENG Jerry | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
45 | DONAHUE Lake | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
46 | FRANGER Max | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | - |
47 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
48 | JONES Reilly | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
49 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
50 | XIONG Aaron | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
50 | KIM Tae | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
52 | GONZALEZ Kian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | 2% |
53 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
54 | BRODSKY Julian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 21% | 4% |
55 | CHEN Zhengyang | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
56 | CLICK Tristan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | |
57 | KIM Jayden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 7% | |
58 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
59 | ROMANOV Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 6% |
60 | ESKRIDGE Caleb | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
61 | DONDISCH ilan | 100% | 67% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
62 | VYSOTSKIY Evan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
63 | TRULL A.J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
64 | MIAO KUNQI | 100% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
65 | MAXU Tiger | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - | |
66 | SAUNIER Cameron | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 14% | 2% | |
66 | GONZALEZ Aaron M | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | |
68 | ZENG Andrew | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
69 | BORISENKO Samuel | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
70 | STAUDINGER Enzo | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
71 | GUO Lucas | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
72 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | 100% | 95% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
73 | LU Nathan | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
74 | WANG Joey | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
75 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
76 | DHAL Leon | 100% | 92% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | |
77 | RUSSELL Michael | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
78 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
79 | MANGAN Hunter | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
80 | DODDAPANENI Aarav | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
81 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
82 | SOKOL Luke | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% | - |
83 | OLSON Joseph | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
84 | XIA Richard | 100% | 68% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
85 | LAM Alan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
86 | TAI Edison | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
87 | LEE DoWon | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
88 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 69% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
89 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
90 | SIEDOW William | 100% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | |
91 | BAKKEN Archer | 100% | 88% | 50% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
92 | AYOTTE James | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
93 | LOISEAU Oscar | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
94 | SCHAFF Wolfgang W. | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.