, - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YU Eric W. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
2 | LOUIE Bryce | - | - | - | 4% | 31% | 64% | |
3 | LI Brandon H. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
3 | ZHANG Daniel D. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
5 | EMMER Chase T. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 70% |
6 | NDIAYE Edriss G. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
7 | TIERNEY David A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 48% | 10% |
8 | YU Vinni | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
9 | LIU Justin | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 55% |
10 | DORITY Philip S. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
11 | LIU Patrick | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
12 | HAMILTON Bogdan A. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 27% | |
13 | KASI Sanjay | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% |
14 | CHEN James P. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
15 | KIM Brandon J. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 3% |
16 | GOOR Julian | - | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - |
17 | XIAO Ethan J. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
18 | CHUNG Andrew N. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 72% |
19 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% |
20 | KAO Castor T. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
21 | GASSNER Ethan I. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
22 | GROSSMAN SMISEK Spencer E. | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
23 | LIAO Jun Heng (James) | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% | |
24 | VOGLER Justin K. | - | - | 6% | 32% | 49% | 13% | |
25 | LIU Niles J. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 46% | 33% | |
26 | OURSLER Jack | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
27 | BINDER Zachary (Zach) B. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% | |
28 | GRIFFIN John O. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% |
29 | TSANG Matthew K. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
30 | BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
31 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
32 | TAN Lawrence (Lance) E. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
33 | HUTH Mitchell | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
34 | BAS Liam | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
34 | ONIK Elijah T. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
36 | JOHNSON Aidan J. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
37 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
38 | SINGH Dayaal | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
39 | XIAO EDWARD | 4% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
40 | LO Conrad | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% |
41 | CHEN Ziyuan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
42 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
43 | CHEN Allen | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
44 | XIAO Enoch A. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% | |
45 | HU Oliver W. | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
46 | GRIFFITH JACK | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
47 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
48 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
49 | REID Clayton J. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
50 | ZHANG Luke T. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
51 | KIM Nicholas W. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
52 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
53 | ZHAO Jason L. | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
54 | YANG Andy H. | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
55 | MAURER Ned (John) E. | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
55 | HODGES Carter F. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
55 | KUMBLA Samarth | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
58 | GRANT Lachlan K. | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
59 | UM Ethan A. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 32% | 8% |
60 | BAE Kevin | 2% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
61 | CHEN Andrew | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
62 | SHA Yi Peng | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
63 | ZENG Lucas H. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
64 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
65 | YANG Luao | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
66 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
67 | PARK Luke J. | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
68 | KO Brian J. | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
69 | LEVY Jacob M. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 2% | |
70 | ZHANG Andy W. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
71 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | - | 6% | 34% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
72 | MARTINEZ Donavyn E. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 18% |
73 | KIM Yonjae | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
74 | SCHENCK Koen M. | 1% | 8% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
75 | DICKSON Farr R. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
76 | HO Ryan J. | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
77 | SHAFAIE Kaveh | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
78 | MA Alexander | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
79 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | 5% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | |
80 | LIN Dashiell | 6% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | |
81 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
82 | HERGERT Benito | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
83 | BANERJEE ANUP | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
84 | YANG Adam | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
85 | LEE Chaemin D. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
86 | BING Charles | 1% | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
87 | KELLY William J. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
88 | MITCHELL Philip D. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
89 | MCCLAIN Bryce C. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 1% |
90 | VAZQUEZ Zander | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 31% | 7% | - |
91 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
92 | STANLEY Mason B. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
93 | ANDERSON Colton J. | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
94 | CHIN Julian S. | - | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
95 | MURRAY Maximo | 2% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
96 | WECHSLER Jacob | 9% | 34% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
97 | OTAKE Jared K. | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 42% | 14% | 1% |
98 | GROSS Roy | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
99 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
100 | AHN Jun | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
101 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
102 | DAVIS Christopher M. | 4% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
103 | LEE Aidan | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
104 | ZHANG Henry C. | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 6% | |
105 | JEON Caleb A. | - | 6% | 31% | 45% | 16% | 1% | |
106 | RITCHIE Luke W. | - | 5% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 4% | |
107 | FLANAGAN James | 2% | 16% | 44% | 32% | 7% | - | |
108 | DESHMUKH Ayush | 3% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
109 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
110 | ZHENG Alan H. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
111 | JANG Jaewon | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
112 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
113 | LEWIS Paul D. | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
114 | WU Alexander | - | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
115 | GRISWOLD Abel B. | 1% | 13% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
116 | BUERGIN Aidan | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
117 | BLUTT Emerson B. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% |
118 | DARIANO Noah G. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
119 | SELENDY Maximilian (Max) A. | 1% | 31% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
120 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
121 | BALL James T. | 1% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
121 | GEE Brandon | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
123 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | 1% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
124 | HORSLEY Alexander | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
125 | LIU Eric Y. | 25% | 51% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
126 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 6% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | |
127 | WU Nicholas | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
128 | BROWN Alexander R. | 11% | 60% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
129 | SICHITIU Alexander | 7% | 31% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
130 | LE Vyn A. | 21% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
131 | LEE Chris | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
132 | HUANG Kevin D. | 41% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
133 | EVGENEV Mark | 2% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
134 | NAGER Noah | 12% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
135 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 45% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
136 | HODESS Ethan | 17% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
137 | ROUNTREE Rob | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
138 | TIAN Aaron C. | 3% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
139 | STRAYER Andrew | 11% | 41% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
140 | HUTH Jacob | - | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
140 | KEE Andrew L. | 9% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
142 | UPTON Craig | 15% | 43% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
143 | BERK Theodore | 17% | 51% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
144 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
145 | WOO Christian | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
146 | WANG Andrew | 15% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
146 | KOBAL Maximilian | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
148 | ZHAO Jesse | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
149 | ROSS III Paul D. | 36% | 45% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
150 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 25% | 49% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
151 | GALLUCCI Charles John | 14% | 46% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
151 | GAUTAM Vishnu | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
153 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
154 | GONG Benjamin | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
155 | HSIUNG Richie | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
156 | OH SEAN | 5% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
156 | LEE Jacob | 25% | 49% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
158 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
159 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
159 | ZHENG zhe | 55% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
161 | WERWA Griffith | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
162 | DRESSEL Jet | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
163 | KLYCZEK Andrew | 59% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
163 | RAINS Jackson T. | 95% | 5% | - | - | - | - | - |
165 | FINLEY Dylan | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
166 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
166 | LEE Lukas | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
168 | LI Avery Peihong | 41% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
169 | PAN Henry | 81% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.