Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MOSES Alexander | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
| 2 | ZHENG Haoran | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 3 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
| 3 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 44% | 19% | |
| 5 | GRAYSON Shane W. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 6 | AHN Gus | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
| 7 | HIGGINS Branford | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 32% | |
| 8 | SARKAR agniv | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 9 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | < 1% |
| 10 | SOOHOO Jackson F. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 11 | KIM Darius H. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 12 | SARKAR Anish | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | MA Victor | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 14 | SHARMA Sanil | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 58% |
| 15 | JIN Daniel | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 16 | KIM Nathan | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 17 | WANG DEVON | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 18 | LO Jake | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
| 19 | LEE Chun Po | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 20 | PHUKAN Rohin | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 3% |
| 21 | LOGUE Ethan D. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 15% |
| 22 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 2% |
| 23 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 36% | 4% |
| 24 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | MOHEBI Saam | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 26 | EVANS noah | 2% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 27 | GAO Zachary | 7% | 33% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 29 | WARD Edward | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 30 | YOUNG Jr Colby | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | SHA Michael | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 32 | STCLAIR Jake | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 33 | TIEN Jabin | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 34 | BAGCHI Aritra | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | KNUDSEN Travis | 3% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | BURLING Trenor | 19% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | GAO Chaney C. | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 38 | KIM Sullivan | 7% | 37% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | EVERS Gabriel | 55% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | WESTON Tom | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 41 | LIU Yikun | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | YUEN Nathan | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 44 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 44 | LAU Christian | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | FERRIERE Joshua | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 31% | 7% | |
| 47 | PAK Elliot | 12% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | KIRK Marcus Haagen | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 49 | FU Leon | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | LAI Aaron | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | JU Hanul | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 53 | WANG owen | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 54 | YU Austin | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 55 | DALVA Michael | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 56 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 56 | SCHROEDER Dylan | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 58 | MIAO KUNQI | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 59 | NA Larry | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 60 | PARK Augustine | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 61 | PEÑA Ethan | 13% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | ROBERTS Tyler | 53% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.