Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
2 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
3 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
3 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 19% | |
5 | GRAYSON Shane W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 26% |
6 | AHN Gus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
7 | HIGGINS Branford | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 32% | |
8 | SARKAR agniv | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
9 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 7% | < 1% |
10 | SOOHOO Jackson F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
11 | KIM Darius H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% |
12 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
13 | MA Victor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% |
14 | SHARMA Sanil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% |
15 | JIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
16 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
17 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
18 | LO Jake | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 14% | 1% |
19 | LEE Chun Po | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
20 | PHUKAN Rohin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 3% |
21 | LOGUE Ethan D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% |
22 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
23 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 4% |
24 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
25 | MOHEBI Saam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% |
26 | EVANS noah | 100% | 98% | 79% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
27 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 93% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | |
28 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
29 | WARD Edward | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
30 | YOUNG Jr Colby | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
31 | SHA Michael | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
32 | STCLAIR Jake | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
33 | TIEN Jabin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
34 | BAGCHI Aritra | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
35 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 97% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
36 | BURLING Trenor | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
37 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
38 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 93% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | |
39 | EVERS Gabriel | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
40 | WESTON Tom | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
41 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
42 | YUEN Nathan | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
43 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
44 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
44 | LAU Christian | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
46 | FERRIERE Joshua | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | 7% | |
47 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
48 | KIRK Marcus Haagen | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
49 | FU Leon | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
50 | LAI Aaron | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
51 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
51 | JU Hanul | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
53 | WANG owen | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
54 | YU Austin | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
55 | DALVA Michael | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
56 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
56 | SCHROEDER Dylan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
58 | MIAO KUNQI | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
59 | NA Larry | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
60 | PARK Augustine | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
61 | PEÑA Ethan | 100% | 87% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
62 | ROBERTS Tyler | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.