Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HADDAD Justin R. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 2 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | V V V D D | V V V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 3 | GOHEL Dayus T. | V V V V D D | V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 3 | JIN Owen | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 5 | JAYENDRA Chandrashekar | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 6 | SHAH Maximilian A. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 7 | O'HARA Keegan J. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 8 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | D D D V D | V V V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 9 | GAO Daniel | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 10 | SHAH S Ayush | V V V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 11 | WU Joseph | V V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | D V V V V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 13 | KOKENGE Clark | D V V V V D | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 14 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | D D V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 15 | LIANG Aaron | D V V D V D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 16 | JEYOON Ryan S. | D V D V D | V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 17 | SHEN Max | V V D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 18 | JIN Alexander | V V D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 19 | ZHAO Luhan | V V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 20 | PARK Frederick | V D V V V | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 21 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | D V V V V D | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 22 | MACARTY Jordan T. | D V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 23 | SJOSTEDT Jacob H. | V D V V D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 24 | KOKENGE Reid | V V D D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 25 | DISIMONE David Z. | V D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 26 | LUKANYUK Lorence | D V V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 27 | SIMPSON Patrick | V D V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 28 | LAI Coby | V D D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 29 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | V D D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 30 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | D D D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 31 | LIEF Isaac R. | V D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 32 | BEZRODNOV Michael | V D D D V D | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 33 | STEVENS Daniel | V V V V D V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 34 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | V D V V V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 35 | PAHLAVI Kamran | V V V D D V | D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
| 36 | CAO Albert | V V V D V D | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 37 | SVIBEN Cameron | D V V V D | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 38 | WANG Tristan | D D V D V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 39 | KING Cameron | D V V V D D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 40 | KUCZAJDA Matthew | D D V D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 41 | DOTSON Gus | D V D D V V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 42 | WU Jonathan | V V D V D D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 43 | KUBATIN Anton V. | D V D V V D | D | 0.3 | 3 | +2.7 |
| 44 | JOSEPH William | D V D V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 45 | KIM Aaron J. | V D V D D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 46 | MARTINEZ Joshua | D V V V D D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 47 | GARCIA-ROGERS Lucas H. | V D V D D | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 48 | LIU John | D D D V V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 49 | ALFAIATE Lucas | D V D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 50 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | D D D V D V | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 51 | LEE Shwan | D D D D V V | D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 52 | MISHIMA Torata | V D D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 53 | HERMANSON David B. | V D V D D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 53 | JENNINGS Adin | D D D V D V | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 55 | HE Lawrence | D D V D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 56 | BANKULLA Nihal R. | V D D D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 57 | WANG Eric S | D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 58 | SERAFIN Ben | D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 59 | LI Jeffrey | V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 60 | BLUM Oliver | V D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 61 | MILLER Kurt | V D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 62 | KUMAR Aidan | D D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 63 | FENWICK Luke A. | D D D D D D | V D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
| 64 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | D D D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 65 | CHOE Andrew | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 66 | HU Robert J. | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 66 | ZHANG ethan | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.