Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HADDAD Justin R. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 28% | 67% |
2 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | |
3 | GOHEL Dayus T. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
3 | JIN Owen | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
5 | JAYENDRA Chandrashekar | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
6 | SHAH Maximilian A. | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
7 | O'HARA Keegan J. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
8 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | 2% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
9 | GAO Daniel | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
10 | SHAH S Ayush | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
11 | WU Joseph | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
12 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
13 | KOKENGE Clark | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
14 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
15 | LIANG Aaron | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
16 | JEYOON Ryan S. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
17 | SHEN Max | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
18 | JIN Alexander | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
19 | ZHAO Luhan | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
20 | PARK Frederick | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
21 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
22 | MACARTY Jordan T. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
23 | SJOSTEDT Jacob H. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 11% |
24 | KOKENGE Reid | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
25 | DISIMONE David Z. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
26 | LUKANYUK Lorence | - | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
27 | SIMPSON Patrick | 2% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
28 | LAI Coby | - | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
29 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | - |
30 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 6% |
31 | LIEF Isaac R. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
32 | BEZRODNOV Michael | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
33 | STEVENS Daniel | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
34 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
35 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
36 | CAO Albert | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
37 | SVIBEN Cameron | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
38 | WANG Tristan | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
39 | KING Cameron | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
40 | KUCZAJDA Matthew | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
41 | DOTSON Gus | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
42 | WU Jonathan | 6% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
43 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 70% | 26% | 4% | < 1% | - | - | - |
44 | JOSEPH William | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
45 | KIM Aaron J. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
46 | MARTINEZ Joshua | 6% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
47 | GARCIA-ROGERS Lucas H. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% | |
48 | LIU John | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
49 | ALFAIATE Lucas | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
50 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
51 | LEE Shwan | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
52 | MISHIMA Torata | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
53 | HERMANSON David B. | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
53 | JENNINGS Adin | 41% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
55 | HE Lawrence | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
56 | BANKULLA Nihal R. | - | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
57 | WANG Eric S | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | |
58 | SERAFIN Ben | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
59 | LI Jeffrey | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
60 | BLUM Oliver | 3% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
61 | MILLER Kurt | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
62 | KUMAR Aidan | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
63 | FENWICK Luke A. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
64 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | 5% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
65 | CHOE Andrew | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
66 | HU Robert J. | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
66 | ZHANG ethan | 81% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.