Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Brandon H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% |
| 2 | WINTERBERG-POULSEN Jonas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 6% | |
| 3 | MATHIEU Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 42% | |
| 3 | KUMBLA Samarth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
| 5 | CHEN Allen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 6 | PAIK Joon K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% | |
| 7 | SERVELLO Augusto | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 23% | |
| 8 | DICKSON Farr R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 9 | HUTH Jacob | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 10 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 39% | 13% | 2% |
| 11 | CHEN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
| 12 | HO Jia Le Sean | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 13 | UM Ethan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
| 14 | BANERJEE Anup | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 15 | CHEN Ziyuan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 16 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 17 | LOUIE Bryce | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% |
| 18 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 19 | LEE Jacob J | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 20 | KELLY William J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 27% |
| 21 | ZHANG Andy W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 22 | TAN Lawrence (Lance) E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 23 | LEWIS Paul D. | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | KIM Nicholas W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | |
| 25 | LI Owen | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 26 | MACHOVEC Andrew C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 27 | XIAO Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 28 | NDIAYE Edriss G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 29 | KIM Yonjae | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 30 | ONIK Elijah T. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | KASI Sanjay | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 12% | |
| 32 | HAMILTON Bogdan A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 27% | 3% | |
| 33 | ZHANG Daniel D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 34 | XIAO Leon (Ruibo) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 35 | SEZER Kaya | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 36 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 2% | |
| 37 | LYU Victor | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 38 | KO Brian J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% | |
| 39 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 40 | BOROWIAK Arwen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
| 41 | HOLMES Stuart S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
| 42 | SONG Aiden S. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 43 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 44 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 45 | LIU Niles J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | |
| 46 | VAZQUEZ Zander | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 47 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 48 | GASSNER Ethan I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% |
| 49 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 50 | JANG Jaewon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 36% | 9% |
| 51 | SINGH Dayaal | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 51 | GLASSON Joseph | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 53 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 54 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 55 | STANLEY Mason B. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 56 | SCHENCK Koen M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 57 | BING Charles | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 58 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | 100% | 95% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 59 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 60 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 61 | KIM Brandon J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% | |
| 62 | IVERSON Shane D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 63 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 64 | XIAO Enoch A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 14% |
| 65 | BAS Liam | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 66 | HUTH Mitchell | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 67 | BRUK Peter J. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
| 68 | LIU Patrick | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
| 69 | LI Eric | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 70 | CHEN James P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
| 70 | MARTINEZ Donavyn E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
| 72 | ZUSIN Zachary W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 73 | LAURICELLA Douglas | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 74 | GROSSMAN SMISEK Spencer E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 75 | WELCH Kyle J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
| 75 | LUTAR Lucas N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 77 | SONG Leonardo T. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 78 | DORAN Wesley C. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 79 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 80 | LI Raphael C. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 81 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 82 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
| 83 | MITCHELL Philip D. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 84 | SHIN Philip D. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 85 | KAISER Hans Z. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 86 | YU Vinni | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
| 87 | HOWARD Michael | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 88 | BUERGIN Aidan | 100% | 95% | 75% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 89 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 90 | LEE Chris | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 92 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 93 | MCCLAIN Bryce C. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 94 | ARIZA Isaac A. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 95 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 96 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 85% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 97 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 98 | YI Stephen K. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 99 | ZHENG Alan H. | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 100 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% | |
| 101 | OURSLER Jack | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% | |
| 102 | YANG Luao | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 103 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 104 | LIN Dashiell | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 105 | ZHANG Henry C. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | |
| 106 | CHENG Matthew S. | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 106 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 108 | SHAFAIE Kaveh | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 109 | HSIUNG Richie | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 110 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 111 | WU Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 112 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 113 | KLOSTERMANN Max | 100% | 93% | 66% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 114 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 115 | SNYTSHEUVEL John Evan (Evan) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 9% |
| 115 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 115 | MICKELSON Jacob P. | 100% | 78% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 118 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 94% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 119 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 120 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 120 | LU Yikai | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 122 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 123 | ZENG Lucas H. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 124 | LINDNER Ruben | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 125 | DANKAR Neel | 100% | 81% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 126 | CHENG Nathan | 100% | 63% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 127 | AHN Jun | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 128 | YU Eric W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
| 129 | DAVIS Christopher M. | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 130 | ZHAO Jason L. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | |
| 131 | GAO William | 100% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 132 | WU Alexander | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
| 133 | CHUNG Andrew N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 23% | |
| 134 | AYUPOV Ilya | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 135 | PELOSKY Zack B. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 136 | LIN Richard W. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 137 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 138 | MION Lorenzo | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 39% | 13% | 2% |
| 139 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 140 | MURRAY Maximo | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 141 | REALS Alden D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 142 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 91% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 143 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 144 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 145 | ZHANG Yun Isaac | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 145 | SICHITIU Alexander | 100% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 145 | DEGROOT Blake | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 148 | LI Jiaan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 148 | OH SEAN | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 150 | CANO Marcos E. | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 150 | MORAIS Paulo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 8% |
| 152 | STRAYER Andrew | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 153 | HEITZ Noah | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.