Pasadena Convention Center - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SINGHA Orion | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
2 | KIM Nathan | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
3 | SARKAR agniv | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
3 | FU Leon | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
5 | SHARMA Sanil | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
6 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
7 | GAO Chaney C. | - | - | 6% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 4% |
8 | KIM Darius H. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
9 | HUSSAIN Kamran | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
10 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
11 | JIN Nicholas | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% |
12 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
13 | WRIGHT Christopher | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 10% | |
14 | MENDOZA Zachari | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
15 | ULINICH Alexander | - | - | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
16 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
17 | ZHENG Haoran | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
18 | DIECK Logan O. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
19 | KIM Benjamin I. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
20 | WANG DEVON | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
21 | MOSES Alexander | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
22 | CHU Allan | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
23 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | - | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | |
24 | MATTIS George | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% | |
25 | GALLO James | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
26 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
27 | LO Jake | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
28 | WANG owen | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
29 | QUITORIANO Jonathan | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
30 | HE Zhiheng | - | 2% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
31 | LOGUE Ethan D. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
32 | LEE Chun Po | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
33 | WONG KEVIN | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
34 | CHEN Bailey | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
35 | ZHANG Alec | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
36 | GAO Zachary | - | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
37 | JONES Aiden | 1% | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
38 | PARK Augustine | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
39 | PARK Elliot | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 11% |
40 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 37% | |
41 | LIU Felix | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
42 | KIM Sullivan | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
43 | TIEN Jabin | 3% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
44 | SINHA Zaan | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
45 | LIU Andrew | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 12% |
46 | EVERS Gabriel | - | 7% | 34% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - |
47 | MULCAHY Olaf | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | |
48 | YAO Derek | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
49 | MCADOO Declan | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | - | |
50 | PHUKAN Rohin | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
51 | JONES Caleb | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
52 | PEñA Ethan | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
53 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 4% |
54 | YOUNG Jr Colby | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
55 | WESTON Tom | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
56 | CHOI San | 12% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
57 | CASTELLY Luke | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
58 | CHOI Kaiden I. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
59 | KIM Jayden | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
60 | AYABINA John | 1% | 9% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
61 | MIAO KUNQI | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
62 | YUEN Nathan | 17% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
63 | PAK Elliot | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
64 | FERRIERE Joshua | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
65 | LIU Yikun | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
66 | KNUDSEN Travis | - | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
67 | DONAHUE Lake | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
68 | KOPPE Alexander | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
69 | BARNETT Devin | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
70 | SCHROEDER Dylan | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
71 | WATT Darren | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
72 | NALBANDIAN VAHAN P. | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
73 | LEE Inwoo | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
74 | MING Nathan | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
75 | DOWDELL Riley | 1% | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
76 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 26% | 57% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
77 | KIM Ian | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
78 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 1% | 7% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
79 | QUITORIANO Matthew | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
80 | ZHANG Nathan | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
81 | JU Hanul | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
82 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
82 | MARTIN Charles | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
84 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 18% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
85 | BUERGISSER Kai | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
86 | MAJAM Brandon Audie | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
87 | SHIRLEY Kai | 13% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
88 | LIU Noah | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
88 | LEE JiYuen | 13% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
90 | LI zerong | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
91 | MCDONALD Ethan | 3% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
92 | LIU Yueri | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
93 | SARKAR Anish | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
93 | GENCHEV Madav | 13% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
95 | GONZALES Leonardo | 48% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
96 | LEE Bryson | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
97 | BUERGISSER Tae | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
98 | PAINTER Noah | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
99 | FAN Joshua | 56% | 39% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
100 | ANDERSON Kai | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
101 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
102 | BAKKEN Archer | 34% | 54% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.