Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | IVE Isaac L. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
2 | RONG Yao (Derek) | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
3 | BOYCE Samuel H. | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
3 | RONA Milan | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
5 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
6 | MARKOTA Vedran | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
7 | KANG Philip F. | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
8 | HESSLEGRAVE Porter B. | D V V V D D | V V V V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
9 | ZHANG Alec | V V V V V D | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
10 | LO Jake | V D V V V V | V V D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
11 | JIN Daniel | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
12 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
13 | ZHANG Nathan | V D V D V V | V V D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
14 | DIECK Logan O. | D D V V D V | V V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
15 | KIM Donghyeok | V D D V V D | V V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
16 | LOGUE Ethan D. | V D D V V D | V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
17 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
18 | HIGGINS Branford | V V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
19 | WONG Daniel | V V D V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
20 | SINGHA Orion | V D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
21 | KIM Benjamin I. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
22 | WATT Darren | D V V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
23 | KIM Nathan | V V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
24 | MA Victor | V V D V D V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
25 | SPROWLES Cameron D. | V D V V V D | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
26 | HE Zhiheng | D V V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
27 | UVAROV Andrii | V V D D V D | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
28 | PARK Elliot | D V D V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
29 | WILSON Brent A. | D V V D V D | V V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
30 | CHEN Bailey | D D V D V V | V V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
31 | SMITH Justin C. | D V D D V D | V V D | 4.8 | 2 | -2.8 |
32 | PAK Elliot | V D D D D D | V V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
33 | WRIGHT Christopher | V V V V V V | D | 3.3 | 6 | +2.7 |
34 | SARKAR Agniv | V V V D V V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
35 | KOPPE Alexander | V V V D V V | D | 1.9 | 5 | +3.1 |
36 | GAO Chaney C. | V V V V V D | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
37 | NIXON Mark | V D V V V V | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
38 | WESTON Tom | V V V D V V | D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
38 | ZHENG Haoran | V V V V V D | D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
40 | GRABER Andrew J. | V V D V V D | D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
41 | DEMPSEY Connor | V D V V V D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
42 | POLAKOSKI David R. | V D V V V D | D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
43 | LIU Noah | V V D V D V | D | 1.3 | 4 | +2.7 |
44 | FRENCH Timothy | V V D D V V | D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
45 | ULINICH Alexander | V D D V V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
46 | SHARMA Sanil | V D V V D V | D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
47 | KIM Sullivan | D V V V D V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
48 | MUNOZ Humberto | D V V D V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
49 | FU Leon | V V V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
50 | CHU Allan | D V D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
51 | BAILEY Creston P. | V V D D V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
51 | MING Nathan | D V V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
53 | WANG Devon | D D D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
54 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | D D D V V D | V D | 5.1 | 2 | -3.1 |
55 | SARKAR Anish | D D V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
56 | PARKER Lane S. | D V V D D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
57 | GAINES Aaron | D D D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
58 | HUSSAIN Kamran | D V D D V D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
59 | KNUDSEN Travis | D D D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
60 | ZHUANG William | D D D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
61 | YUEN Nathan | D D D V D D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
62 | LIU Felix | D V D D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
62 | LEE Bryson | D V D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
64 | ALEXANDER Chuck | D D D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
65 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | V D D V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
66 | MENDOZA Zandro | D V D D V V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
67 | SINHA Zaan | V D D V D V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
68 | LOFTUS Luca | V V D D D V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
69 | PERKINS-OLLILA Justin W. | D V D V D D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
70 | MENDOZA Zachari | D V D D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
71 | PHEN Justin P. | D D V D D V | D | 4.5 | 2 | -2.5 |
72 | LIU Yikun | D V V D D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
73 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | D D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
74 | LIU Andrew | D D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
75 | HILLSTROM Nathan | D D D D V D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
76 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
77 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | D V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
78 | ALI Adam | D V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
79 | LEE Richard U. | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
79 | JU Hanul | D D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
81 | HEWITT Frank F. | D V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
82 | KURITZ Marc M. | D D D D D V | D | 3.9 | 1 | -2.9 |
83 | MIAO Kunqi | D D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
84 | LEE Chun Po | D D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
85 | NALBANDIAN Vahan P. | D D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
86 | KIM Taeho | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
87 | PRAKASH Hari | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
88 | DOWDELL Riley | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
89 | SETTE Alessandro | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
90 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
91 | MARSH Timothy G. | D D D D D D | D | 3.6 | 0 | -3.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.