University of Maryland, Reckord Armory - College Park, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MAZUR Daniil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
| 2 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
| 3 | NORTH Alexander M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 14% |
| 3 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | |
| 5 | CHEN Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
| 6 | SHAH S Ayush | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 28% |
| 7 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | |
| 8 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
| 9 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
| 10 | CLICK Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% |
| 11 | SHELANSKI Isaac | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% |
| 12 | CAI Brian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
| 13 | HEADRICK Lance | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% | < 1% |
| 14 | NOWAK Jakub P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 24% |
| 15 | LI Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
| 16 | SHEN Max | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
| 17 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
| 18 | CULPEPPER John (JR) R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 49% |
| 19 | TRIMMER Colin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 20 | HANSEN Lars | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | 4% |
| 21 | NORTH Gary S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 22 | CAO Albert | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 23 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
| 24 | SINGH Aryaman | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 25% |
| 26 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
| 27 | WOODLEY Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% |
| 28 | VELINOV Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% | 1% |
| 29 | SAKO Ayrton J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 30 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 40% | 8% | - |
| 31 | KIM Dylan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 15% |
| 32 | CARTER Austin L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% | 5% |
| 33 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% |
| 34 | FU Leon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 35 | ZHANG Caden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 54% | 14% | 1% |
| 36 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 31% |
| 37 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 93% | 60% | 20% | 3% | < 1% | - |
| 38 | ELLINGTON Keegan A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% | 4% |
| 39 | SHREM Samuel G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
| 40 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% | |
| 41 | BROWN Joshua (Josh) A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 42 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 36% |
| 43 | CHEN Wesley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 44 | ROTHKA Spencer J. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | MCDANIELS Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% |
| 46 | FULLER George K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 47 | MEGGERS Davin | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 48 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 18% |
| 49 | SWANSON Lars M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 6% |
| 50 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 51 | JORDAN Anton | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 6% | |
| 52 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 53 | TIRRELL Justin J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 6% | |
| 54 | KIM Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 52% | 10% |
| 55 | STEPHENS Corbin | 100% | 100% | 87% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 56 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 97% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | HUGHES Michael D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 58 | WHEELER Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 6% |
| 59 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 60 | USDIN Anton | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 61 | SWENSON Keane J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% | |
| 62 | AMOLSCH Dylan | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 63 | NIKOLOV Peter | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
| 64 | KIM Jeff | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 65 | CAO Brad | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 66 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 19% | 2% |
| 67 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 67 | MAROCHNIK Daniel | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 69 | COHEN Jared E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
| 70 | HARDY Tristan L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 2% |
| 71 | HERZ Alexander S. | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 72 | WALTHER Bryan M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 73 | FISHMAN Rahm | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 74 | DISIMONE David Z. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 75 | MURRAY-GRAMLICH Robert | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 76 | KWOUN Miles S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 77 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 78 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 79 | ROTONDI Gregory V. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | |
| 80 | MODANLOU Navid | 100% | 88% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | ABBOUD Michael | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 82 | ZHANG Sen | 100% | 96% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 83 | ZIMINSKY Karel M. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 84 | BERNARD Jack B. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 85 | HUTZ Michael B. | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | BANNEN Nicholas | 100% | 84% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 87 | SHAFRITZ Noah | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 88 | SAUNIER Cameron | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 89 | MARSH Alex | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | PAN Colin | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 91 | WANG Clayton | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 92 | ILYAS Zakariya | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 93 | NANCE Jonathan W. | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 94 | TOMASZEWSKI Joshua | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 95 | MILLSON Daniel | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 96 | SO Lorenzo | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 97 | WANG Aiden | 100% | 50% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 98 | WU Shaochi | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 99 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 100 | SEID Zachary W. | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 101 | O'REILLY Robert | 100% | 81% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 102 | PETROW Zoryan | 100% | 96% | 72% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 103 | MARKOWITZ William M. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 104 | WOODLEY George | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 105 | GAUVEY Ken C. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 4% | - |
| 106 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 107 | MARTINEZ Joshua | 100% | 100% | 85% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 108 | PALAMARCHUK Matthew | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 109 | BUI Ryan | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 110 | HULL Liam | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 110 | DAN Rex | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 112 | BUCCELLATO Joel S. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 113 | LENZ Carter | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 114 | ALI Adam | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 115 | MORET Eric N. | 100% | 81% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 116 | DAN Chuntao | 100% | 92% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 116 | WATERS Nathaniel | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 116 | FORAIDA Khalid | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 116 | WATSON Raymond | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 120 | KANG JUNWOO | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 121 | GIAMPETRO Nicholas | 100% | 31% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.