Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MATTIS George | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
2 | JEON Alexander E. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 58% |
3 | LO Jake | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
3 | WONG Chi Ho | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
5 | ZHU Max | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
6 | JIN Nicholas | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 39% |
6 | WRIGHT Christopher | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
8 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
9 | GAO Chaney C. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 47% | 23% |
10 | MOSES Alexander | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 63% |
11 | ZHENG Haoran | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
12 | HUSSAIN Kamran | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
13 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% |
14 | KIM Dylan J. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
15 | KIM Nathan | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
16 | PAK Elliot | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
17 | KIM Minjae | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
18 | PHUKAN Rohin | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
19 | YUEN Nathan | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
20 | MIAO KUNQI | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
20 | SCHROEDER Dylan | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
20 | EVERS Gabriel | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
23 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
24 | YUE Hongrui | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
25 | KIM Sullivan | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
26 | LEE Chun Po | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
27 | DOWDELL Riley | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
28 | MULCAHY Olaf | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
29 | CASTELLY Luke | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
30 | RANGEL Arturo | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% |
31 | KIM Andrew J. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
32 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
33 | SEO Shawn | - | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
34 | NALBANDIAN VAHAN P. | 4% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
35 | CHEN Bailey | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
36 | GALLO James | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
37 | SARKAR Anish | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
38 | SINGHA Orion | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
39 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
40 | JONES Caleb | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 4% |
41 | WANG owen | 1% | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
41 | WESTON Tom | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
43 | SINHA Zaan | 1% | 14% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
44 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
45 | FU Leon | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% | |
46 | MCMANUS Farran | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
47 | LEE Inwoo | 4% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
48 | HINTON Evan | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
49 | LEE Jake (JiYuen) | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
50 | LIU Yikun | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
51 | ZI QIN Shang | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
52 | HE Zhiheng | 1% | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
53 | JU Hanul | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
54 | NG Biwon | 20% | 40% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
55 | JAMES Patrick | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
56 | WATT Darren | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
57 | LEE Bryson | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
58 | LI Ethan R. | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
59 | MENDOZA Zachari | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
60 | LI Yunji | 10% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
61 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | 1% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
62 | ZHANG Joe | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
63 | CROSSMAN Brandon | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
64 | PAINTER Noah | 33% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
65 | DAO Alexander | 1% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
66 | RAMOS Max | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
67 | KNUDSEN Travis | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
68 | CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
69 | TIEN Jabin | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
70 | LIU Noah | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
71 | MING Nathan | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
72 | RICHARD silas | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
73 | GOMEZ ISLAS Ezar Emiliano | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
74 | LIU Yueri | 7% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
75 | PRAKASH Hari | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
75 | FERDOWSIAN Samuel A | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
77 | SHIRLEY Kai | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
78 | CHU Allan | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
79 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
80 | MCDONALD Ethan | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
80 | CLAES Lucas | 25% | 47% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
82 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
83 | ROBINSON Samuel | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
84 | GU Aidan | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
85 | LI zerong | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
86 | YU Austin | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
87 | LAU Christian | 62% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
88 | SHEN Jiayi | 61% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
89 | BUFFINGTON Bryson | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.