Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MATTIS George | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 2 | JEON Alexander E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% |
| 3 | LO Jake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 3 | WONG Chi Ho | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 5 | ZHU Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 6 | JIN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% |
| 6 | WRIGHT Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 16% |
| 8 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 9 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 23% |
| 10 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 63% |
| 11 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 12 | HUSSAIN Kamran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
| 13 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 14 | KIM Dylan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 15 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 16 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
| 17 | KIM Minjae | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | |
| 18 | PHUKAN Rohin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 19 | YUEN Nathan | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | MIAO KUNQI | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 20 | SCHROEDER Dylan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
| 20 | EVERS Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
| 23 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 24 | YUE Hongrui | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 25 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% | |
| 26 | LEE Chun Po | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | MULCAHY Olaf | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
| 29 | CASTELLY Luke | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 30 | RANGEL Arturo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% |
| 31 | KIM Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 4% |
| 32 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 33 | SEO Shawn | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | NALBANDIAN VAHAN P. | 100% | 96% | 69% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 36 | GALLO James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 37 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
| 38 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
| 39 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 40 | JONES Caleb | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
| 41 | WANG owen | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 41 | WESTON Tom | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 43 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 99% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 44 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 45 | FU Leon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% | |
| 46 | MCMANUS Farran | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 47 | LEE Inwoo | 100% | 96% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 48 | HINTON Evan | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | LEE Jake (JiYuen) | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 50 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 51 | ZI QIN Shang | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 52 | HE Zhiheng | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 53 | JU Hanul | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 54 | NG Biwon | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | JAMES Patrick | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 56 | WATT Darren | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 57 | LEE Bryson | 100% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 58 | LI Ethan R. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 59 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 60 | LI Yunji | 100% | 90% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 61 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 62 | ZHANG Joe | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 63 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 64 | PAINTER Noah | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 65 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 66 | RAMOS Max | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 67 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 68 | CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 69 | TIEN Jabin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 70 | LIU Noah | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 71 | MING Nathan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 72 | RICHARD silas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 73 | GOMEZ ISLAS Ezar Emiliano | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 74 | LIU Yueri | 100% | 93% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 75 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | FERDOWSIAN Samuel A | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 77 | SHIRLEY Kai | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 78 | CHU Allan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 79 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 80 | MCDONALD Ethan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 80 | CLAES Lucas | 100% | 75% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 82 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 83 | ROBINSON Samuel | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 84 | GU Aidan | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 85 | LI zerong | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 86 | YU Austin | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 87 | LAU Christian | 100% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 88 | SHEN Jiayi | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 89 | BUFFINGTON Bryson | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.