Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SODERBERG Alex Z. | V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
2 | LO Jake | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
3 | KIM Benjamin I. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
3 | SINGHA Orion | V V D V V D | V V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
5 | GALLO James | V V D V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
6 | ZHU Zimo | V V D D V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
7 | WESTPHAL David R. | V D D V V D | V V V V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
8 | MOSES Alexander | V D V D V D | V V V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
9 | SHEPARD Trevor S. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
10 | KIM Nathan | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
11 | YAO Derek (Shunyu) | V V V V V D | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
12 | WATT Darren | V D V V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
13 | CHIEN Brandon | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
14 | WONG Chi Ho | V V D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
15 | CUMMINGS Atticus C. | D V V V V D | V V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
16 | ZONE Liam | V V V D D D | V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
17 | JEON Alexander E. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
18 | LIN Kyran | V V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
19 | MA Victor | V V V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
20 | ZHENG Haoran | V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
21 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
22 | BOYCE Samuel H. | D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
23 | PAK Elliot | D V V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
24 | LIPTON Jason S. | D V V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
25 | POLAKOSKI David R. | V D V D V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
26 | VENET Téva | D V V V V D | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
27 | ULINICH Alexander | V V D D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
28 | STRAUSS Luke | V V D V D | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
29 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | V V D V D | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
30 | KIM Darius H. | V V D D V D | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
31 | STEPHAN Jens | V V V D D D | V V D | 5.4 | 3 | -2.4 |
32 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | D V V D D | V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
33 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | V V D V V V | D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
34 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | V V D V V V | D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
35 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | D V V V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
36 | MCDANIELS Jeremy | V D V V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
37 | MCADOO Declan | V D V V V D | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
38 | JIN Nicholas | D V V V V D | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
39 | JIN Daniel | V V V V D D | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
40 | MADSEN Jr Eric W. | D D V V V V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
40 | FU Leon | D V V D V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
42 | CHU Allan | V V V D D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
43 | FOWLER James A. | V V D V D V | D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
44 | JU Hanul | V V D V D V | D | 1.2 | 4 | +2.8 |
45 | KIM Sterling S. | V V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
46 | ZAYDMAN David M. | D V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
47 | LOGUE Ethan D. | D V V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
48 | SMITH Justin C. | D D V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
49 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | D V D D V V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
50 | JONES Caleb | D D D V V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
51 | GAO Chaney C. | D V V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
52 | MENDOZA Zachari | V D D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
53 | PERKINS-OLLILA Justin W. | D V D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
54 | KNUDSEN Travis | V D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
55 | KIM Sullivan | D V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
56 | MUNOZ Humberto | V D V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
57 | CHEN Bailey | D V V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
58 | PARKER Lane S. | V D D V D D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
59 | FAN Beichen | V D V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
60 | LIU Yikun | D D D V V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
61 | LEE Chun Po | D D V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
62 | UVAROV Andrii | V D D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
63 | CHOI San | D D V D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
64 | ZHANG Alec | D D D D D D | V D | 3.2 | 0 | -3.2 |
65 | WANG owen | D V V V D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
66 | HELGE James R. | V V D D V D | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
67 | DAO Alexander | D V D D V V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
68 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | D D V V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
69 | GREGER Jack | D D V D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
70 | SINHA Zaan | D D D V V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
71 | ZHUANG William | D D D D V V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
72 | HILLSTROM Nathan | D D D D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
73 | YU Austin | V D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
74 | CLAWSON Brian C. | D D V D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
75 | GU Aidan | V D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
76 | GREEN Jake L. | V D V D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
77 | KENT V David | V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
78 | PALACIOS Justin M. | V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
79 | KURITZ Marc M. | D D D V D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
80 | CROSSMAN Brandon | D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
81 | LEE Bryson | D D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
82 | KIM Taeho | D D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
83 | MIAO KUNQI | D D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
84 | TODD Glenn | D D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
85 | LI zerong | D D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
86 | GENCHEV Madav | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
87 | HEWITT Frank F. | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
87 | PRAKASH Hari | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
89 | CHAO Warren | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
90 | BRAHMBHATT Krishna | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
91 | BRECHTEL James | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
92 | PAINTER Noah | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
93 | LEE Richard U. | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.