San Diego, CA - San Diego, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% |
2 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 7% |
3 | RANGEL Arturo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% |
5 | LEE Alexander G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
6 | HWANG Samuel W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
7 | SHARMA Sanil | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 28% | ||
8 | JIN Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
9 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
10 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 14% | |
11 | WONG Daniel | 100% | 92% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
12 | POCSVEILER Magor | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
13 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 11% |
14 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | |
15 | GILLISON Edward L. | 100% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - |
16 | KIM Darius H. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
17 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
18 | THOMPSON Chester | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 7% | |
19 | PRASAD Ankith | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 29% |
20 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
21 | MOHEBI Saam | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 18% | ||
22 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 38% | 10% |
23 | JIN daniel | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - |
24 | GYURE Brayden H. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
25 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
26 | ZHU Max | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
27 | HUSSAIN Kamran | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
28 | DIECK Logan O. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% | |
29 | DRIBIN Ezra | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - | |
30 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
31 | SIVAGAR Leo | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 12% | ||
32 | CHOI Isaac | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 6% | |
33 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
34 | NOEL Sebastien A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 5% |
35 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
36 | MATTIS George | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
37 | USHER Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
38 | AHN Gus | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
39 | XU Alex | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
40 | WRIGHT Christopher | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
41 | MARQUEZ ALDANA EThan Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
43 | CHU Anthony | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
44 | MILEY Nick N. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
45 | PAI Nandan K. | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
46 | FEES HOLDEN | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
47 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
48 | BAGCHI Aritra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
49 | WESTON Tom | 100% | 61% | 16% | 2% | - | ||
50 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
51 | SEWELL Jacob | 100% | 94% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | |
52 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | 100% | 92% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
53 | CORDOVA-CHAVARRY Alejandro | 100% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
54 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 78% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
55 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 8% |
56 | LIU Kirk D. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
57 | YEH Preston | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
58 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
59 | PARK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
60 | WONG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
61 | CHU Allan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 2% | |
62 | DRIBIN Zev | 100% | 75% | 25% | 3% | - | ||
63 | NIKOLOV Peter | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
64 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 50% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
65 | ZHANG Alec | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.