Cobra Challenge SYC-RCC

Y-14 Men's Épée

Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 8:00 AM

Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 BEZRODNOV Michael - - 1% 10% 39% 50%
2 BEZRODNOV Alexander - - - 2% 12% 40% 46%
3 KOKENGE Reid - - 3% 13% 32% 37% 16%
3 ZHAO corey - - - 2% 13% 41% 44%
5 LEE Seungwon - - - 2% 16% 43% 38%
6 SU Caleb - - - - 2% 21% 77%
7 CAO Albert - 1% 5% 18% 35% 32% 10%
8 LEE Noah - - - 2% 13% 39% 46%
9 JEYOON Ryan S. - - - 1% 10% 37% 51%
9 ARAVIND Athreya - - 5% 20% 39% 29% 6%
11 WIMMER Nathaniel P. - - - 5% 23% 43% 27%
12 IARIKOV Nicholas - - - 3% 19% 44% 33%
13 TIYA BIAYA K. - - 2% 16% 48% 34%
14 SAVORETTI Francesco - - 5% 20% 39% 29% 6%
15 SONN Rohan - 1% 6% 26% 40% 23% 4%
16 KOYFMAN Benjamin 1% 9% 27% 35% 22% 6% -
17 MACARTY Jordan T. - - - 2% 12% 40% 46%
18 SINGH Aryaman - - 5% 23% 42% 28% 3%
19 DESTEFANO Julius - - - 3% 19% 48% 29%
20 MAHESH Tarun - 4% 16% 31% 32% 15% 2%
21 ZAYDMAN Ethan - - 1% 9% 30% 43% 17%
22 DURKIN Tristan E. - 2% 12% 32% 36% 17% 2%
23 DODIN David - - 5% 22% 40% 26% 6%
24 LOISEAU Eliott - 3% 18% 40% 32% 7%
25 KATS Dylan G. - - - 5% 21% 43% 31%
26 LEE Samuel Y. - - 2% 12% 32% 40% 13%
27 OTTO Nathaniel B. - 1% 8% 29% 41% 20% 1%
28 LAM Alan - 4% 21% 38% 28% 8% 1%
29 WU Jonathan - - 3% 16% 36% 34% 10%
30 SHCHUR Landon - - 2% 16% 48% 34%
31 NATSVLISHVILI John Vano 2% 11% 27% 33% 21% 6% 1%
32 SONG Troy 1% 6% 23% 37% 25% 6% 1%
33 KIM Byung - - - 2% 15% 46% 37%
34 THAKUR Om S. - 1% 8% 26% 38% 23% 4%
35 WOLFE Alex - - 1% 8% 29% 43% 19%
36 WANG Clayton - 1% 11% 31% 36% 18% 3%
37 CHOI Aleksey - 6% 26% 38% 23% 6% 1%
37 WANG Zhixing (Daniel) - 1% 8% 28% 40% 20% 3%
39 CHIMOSKEY Finn D. - 4% 19% 36% 30% 11% 1%
40 MAO Benjamin 2% 17% 44% 30% 6% -
41 NAKAS Levent - 5% 22% 41% 27% 5%
42 SINGH Ravin 1% 8% 33% 42% 14% 1%
43 BRAVO ORTEGA Estéfano - - 2% 12% 33% 39% 15%
44 LAI Boden 2% 14% 36% 33% 13% 2% -
45 LI Zachary 1% 9% 27% 35% 21% 6% 1%
46 SAVORETTI Pietro 2% 14% 31% 32% 17% 4% -
47 MALHAM Andrew 6% 26% 37% 24% 7% 1% -
48 BRODSKY Julian 2% 12% 29% 33% 18% 4% -
49 SILVERS Ari - 2% 12% 32% 36% 16% 2%
49 HU Anton 7% 27% 38% 22% 6% 1% -
51 ZHANG ethan 7% 32% 39% 18% 4% - -
52 ZHU Eric 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2% -
53 WU Colin 4% 20% 35% 28% 10% 2% -
54 SAUNIER Cameron 2% 15% 33% 32% 15% 3% -
55 PETROW Zoryan 16% 37% 31% 13% 3% - -
56 PETROV Niki A. 1% 10% 29% 35% 19% 5% -
56 FANG Hanning 2% 11% 29% 34% 19% 4% -
58 FISHMAN Rahm 1% 6% 20% 33% 28% 11% 1%
59 DAN Rex 1% 9% 30% 38% 18% 3% -
60 ALI Farhan 6% 38% 39% 15% 2% - -
61 HU Robert J. 17% 37% 31% 13% 2% - -
62 YU Jason 10% 38% 36% 13% 2% - -
63 MISHRA Milan B. 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1% -
64 LIU Adam 12% 34% 34% 16% 3% - -
65 CAO Brad - - 3% 18% 38% 33% 7%
66 GRENKE Wyatt 11% 32% 35% 18% 4% - -
67 TSE Maxwell - 4% 20% 39% 29% 8% -
68 XIE Brandon 3% 22% 41% 27% 7% -
69 CHOI Christian 12% 40% 35% 12% 2% - -
70 ARMSTRONG TyLee 23% 42% 27% 7% 1% - -
71 FENG du 2% 11% 30% 36% 18% 3% -
72 NILSEN Mark 7% 34% 39% 17% 3% - -
73 FENG shang 11% 37% 35% 14% 3% - -
74 PAN Tristan 1% 10% 29% 36% 20% 4% -
75 XIONG Aaron 2% 14% 33% 34% 14% 3% -
76 SIEDOW William 39% 45% 14% 2% - -
77 GINZBURG Adam 7% 35% 39% 16% 3% -
78 BAMBRA Taranjot 2% 17% 38% 31% 10% 1% -
79 LEE Aiden 4% 20% 34% 28% 11% 2% -
80 PAVLENISHVILI Luke 15% 38% 33% 12% 2% - -
81 REPIC Oliver 49% 40% 10% 1% - - -
82 KUGLER Luke 1% 16% 39% 31% 10% 1% -
83 JIANG Matthew 1% 11% 32% 35% 17% 3% -
84 STAUDINGER Enzo 50% 39% 10% 1% - - -
85 ZENG Andrew 6% 30% 39% 20% 4% - -
86 BARATY Teagan 58% 34% 7% 1% - - -
87 SCHAUER Oliver 46% 41% 12% 1% - - -
88 AYOTTE James 58% 34% 7% 1% - -
89 MEGGERS Davin 44% 41% 13% 2% - - -
89 SHUM Kaden 5% 26% 42% 23% 4% - -
91 VODOVOZOV Denis 19% 37% 29% 12% 2% - -
92 AHN EZRA 26% 49% 22% 3% - -
93 LOISEAU Oscar 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
93 SONG Ryan 10% 29% 34% 20% 6% 1% -
95 BRADSHAW Carter 3% 24% 42% 25% 6% 1% -
96 DA GRACA Tyler 70% 27% 3% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.