BladeRunner ROC+RJC

Junior Men's Épée

Sunday, November 7, 2021 at 2:30 PM

RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 YUMIACO Nolan C. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 26%
2 SINGHA Orion 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 23%
3 SHUR Yakov C. 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 65% 20%
3 JIN daniel 100% 100% 97% 85% 56% 23% 4%
5 WONG Daniel 100% 100% 96% 78% 43% 11%
6 MA Victor 100% 100% 99% 90% 66% 30% 6%
7 JAIN Aditya 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 42% 9%
8 LUCERO-OLSON Aydin 100% 100% 99% 90% 65% 29% 6%
9 ZHU Max 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 29%
10 KIM Benjamin I. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 29%
11 CHIRASHNYA Adam 100% 100% 95% 77% 41% 10%
12 MATTIS George 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 20%
13 WANG Nathan 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 34%
14 USHER Alexander 100% 100% 95% 73% 36% 7%
15 LEVITSKY Jonathan 100% 100% 99% 95% 75% 37% 7%
16 KIM Darius H. 100% 100% 96% 80% 48% 17% 2%
17 XIAN Ryan 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 61% 21%
18 AHN Gus 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 55% 17%
19 WONG Nathan 100% 99% 90% 63% 28% 7% 1%
20 CROSSMAN Brandon 100% 90% 58% 22% 4% -
21 GREEN Jabreel 100% 100% 94% 73% 36% 8%
22 ALVAREZ Ian T. 100% 100% 99% 92% 65% 26% 4%
23 GREEN Ummi 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 44% 9%
24 MOSES Alexander 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 72% 27%
25 COOPER Rowan 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 12%
26 WANG Devon 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 35% 7%
27 HUSSAIN Kamran 100% 99% 92% 67% 31% 8% 1%
28 GULLO Kenji Y. 100% 99% 87% 54% 19% 3%
29 CHU Allan 100% 100% 96% 78% 44% 14% 2%
30 MENDOZA Zachari 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 31% 6%
31 WEAVER Neil 100% 100% 98% 89% 64% 29% 6%
32 KOPPE Alexander 100% 99% 94% 74% 42% 14% 2%
33 LO Jake 100% 100% 97% 80% 35% 7% 1%
34 ZHOU Stanley Q. 100% 100% 99% 89% 57% 19% 3%
35 LOWE-THORPE Tyler 100% 99% 90% 61% 25% 5% -
36 GRAYSON Shane W. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 18%
37 PARK Elliot 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 44% 10%
38 HIGGINS Branford 100% 100% 99% 91% 68% 33% 7%
39 BURLING Trenor 100% 74% 32% 8% 1% -
40 KIM Nathan 100% 99% 89% 61% 25% 4%
41 PHUKAN Rohin 100% 99% 93% 69% 33% 8% 1%
42 LEE Chun Po 100% 97% 80% 45% 14% 2% -
42 STCLAIR Jake 100% 96% 80% 49% 20% 5% -
44 BAGCHI Aritra 100% 97% 83% 53% 22% 5% -
45 ZHENG Haoran 100% 100% 98% 86% 58% 23% 4%
46 ULINICH Alexander 100% 98% 85% 53% 21% 4% -
47 QUITORIANO Matthew 100% 98% 85% 55% 23% 5% -
48 YU Austin 100% 87% 46% 12% 2% - -
49 WESTON Tom 100% 97% 82% 51% 20% 4% -
50 LOGUE Ethan D. 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 23%
50 DEKERMANJI Christopher 100% 99% 94% 72% 35% 7%
52 CHIRASHNYA Daniel 100% 96% 75% 40% 13% 2% -
53 GAO Chaney C. 100% 95% 72% 35% 9% 1% -
54 LIU Andrew 100% 100% 99% 92% 69% 31% 6%
55 YUEN Nathan 100% 65% 22% 4% - - -
56 DOWDELL Riley 100% 88% 51% 16% 3% -
57 SIVAGAR Leo 100% 100% 96% 75% 37% 8%
58 JU Hanul 100% 58% 16% 2% - -
59 YAO Geoffrey B. 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 17% 2%
60 WATT Darren 100% 96% 73% 37% 11% 2% -
61 MILSTEIN Nikolas 100% 67% 25% 5% - - -
62 FU Leon 100% 88% 48% 10% 1% - -
63 QUITORIANO Jonathan 100% 83% 42% 12% 2% - -
64 MCDONALD Ethan 100% 96% 77% 40% 11% 1%
65 ZHANG Nathan 100% 80% 41% 12% 2% - -
66 DALVA Michael 100% 95% 71% 34% 10% 1% -
67 KIM Sullivan 100% 86% 52% 20% 4% - -
68 ARUN Madhav 100% 84% 42% 8% 1% - -
69 EVERS Gabriel 100% 68% 27% 6% 1% - -
70 KNUDSEN Travis 100% 85% 45% 14% 2% -
71 LOMIO Nicholas A. 100% 77% 37% 10% 1% -
72 BRUSKOTTER Reiland 100% 98% 86% 56% 23% 5% -
73 WILLIS Alan 100% 89% 58% 23% 5% 1% -
74 PARK Augustine 100% 60% 19% 3% - - -
75 PEÑA Ethan 100% 96% 75% 38% 10% 1% -
76 DU Shunyu K. 100% 89% 51% 17% 3% - -
76 MIAO Kunqi 100% 67% 21% 2% - - -
78 LIU Yikun 100% 56% 14% 2% - - -
79 WARD Edward 100% 99% 92% 67% 31% 6%
80 MACK Travis 100% 56% 15% 2% - - -
81 HALL Gabriel 100% 96% 68% 23% 4% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.