Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | CLICK Aiden | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 28% |
| 2 | WIMMER Chandler M. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 3 | LIU John | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
| 3 | LEE Daniel Y. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 5 | STEVENS Daniel | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 39% | 9% |
| 6 | JIN Alexander | - | - | 8% | 38% | 47% | 7% |
| 7 | JIN Owen | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
| 8 | VALES Keyan | 16% | 44% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 9 | CHONG christopher | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 16% |
| 10 | WOZNIAK Ignacy | - | - | 5% | 25% | 47% | 23% |
| 11 | PARK Ian C. | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 25% | |
| 12 | RHYU Kozmo | - | - | 3% | 18% | 46% | 33% |
| 13 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% |
| 14 | JEYOON Ryan S. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 11% |
| 15 | CHEN Eric | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 29% | 6% |
| 16 | JAYENDRA Chandrashekar | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 17 | BEACH Nicholas | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
| 18 | LEE Timothy S. | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
| 19 | SPIER Julian H. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 20 | DOLMETSCH Max | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 20% |
| 21 | PARK Frederick | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 22 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 23 | WANG Tristan | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | KROPP Jack | - | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 21% |
| 25 | WU Joseph | - | 4% | 21% | 46% | 29% | |
| 26 | LI Benjamin | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 27 | TREBON Hayden | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | MURPHY Thomas P. | - | 12% | 52% | 31% | 5% | - |
| 29 | LEE Shwan | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
| 30 | LURVEY Samuel | 4% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 31 | CRANE Matthew T. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 32 | CHAWLA Armaan | - | 3% | 21% | 43% | 28% | 5% |
| 33 | HADDAD Justin R. | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
| 34 | KUCZAJDA Matthew | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 9% |
| 35 | HORTELANO Ethan | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% |
| 36 | JUNG Minche | 2% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 37 | KING Cameron | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 38 | SHIV Rishi | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
| 39 | O'HARA Keegan J. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
| 40 | SCHULZE Ethan | 3% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | MORSE Tyler | - | 1% | 19% | 50% | 27% | 2% |
| 41 | COUGHLIN Nolan E. | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | XIA Oliver | 6% | 66% | 26% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | GOLDER Will W. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% |
| 45 | KIM Ryan | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 46 | PARNAS Ely | 1% | 12% | 41% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 47 | ROTHKA Spencer J. | 34% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | SINGH Aryaman | 7% | 35% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 49 | WU Jonathan | 6% | 34% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 49 | GAO Daniel | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 26% | 5% |
| 51 | SURINGA William J. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 52 | JOSEPH William | 4% | 24% | 44% | 24% | 4% | |
| 53 | BANNEN Nicholas | 42% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | PARK Brian | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
| 55 | ALTUVE Alejandro J. | 6% | 32% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 55 | BERKOWITZ Jeffrey | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 57 | USDIN Anton | 13% | 37% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 58 | BLUM Oliver | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 59 | ZHANG Caden | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | LEE JoonWon | 36% | 49% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | METZLER Calder | 62% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 62 | BERNARD Jack B. | 44% | 47% | 8% | - | - | - |
| 63 | LIN Harrison | 35% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 64 | GOLDMAN Isaac | 91% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
| 65 | PALAMARCHUK Matthew | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 66 | LAM Bill | 35% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 67 | WHITEHURST JJ | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 68 | FU Ethan | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 69 | MILLER Kurt | 56% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | JEON Hwidong | 16% | 44% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 71 | ZHANG Andy | 44% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.