Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC

Y-14 Men's Foil

Sunday, May 30, 2021 at 8:00 AM

Meadowlands Exposition Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LIANG Lixi (Henry) - - - 1% 7% 34% 58%
2 LI Richard - - - 1% 8% 34% 58%
3 GRAHAM Roy J. - - - 2% 11% 39% 49%
3 WU Alexander - - - - 2% 20% 78%
5 LEE Jacob J - - 1% 7% 24% 42% 26%
6 TOLBA Abdelrahman - - - 4% 21% 45% 29%
7 TSIMIKLIS Yanni - 1% 7% 25% 39% 25% 4%
8 LEE Aidan - - 1% 6% 26% 45% 23%
9 RUSADZE Nickolas - - - 5% 33% 61%
10 SIU Aiden - 2% 10% 27% 37% 21% 3%
11 KIM Yonjae - - - 1% 9% 36% 53%
12 HOOSHI Jayden C. - - - 1% 7% 33% 60%
13 ANTON Nathaniel - - 2% 10% 31% 41% 16%
13 CHENG Jonathan - - - 3% 14% 40% 43%
15 MARX Oscar L. - - - 1% 11% 38% 49%
16 OH Sean - - 1% 9% 30% 41% 18%
17 ZHAI Jeffrey - - 1% 5% 21% 42% 31%
17 AHN Jun - - - 3% 17% 43% 37%
19 WANG Mason - 13% 35% 35% 15% 3% -
20 SONG Bryan - 6% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1%
21 PO Oliver - - 7% 30% 41% 19% 2%
22 DOCTOR Aidan L. - 1% 4% 18% 36% 33% 8%
23 WECHSLER Jacob - 1% 7% 24% 38% 25% 5%
24 TRAUGOT Owen G. - 1% 7% 24% 39% 25% 4%
25 MARTIN IV Elmer D. - 1% 8% 23% 36% 26% 6%
26 PALMA Matthew Dominic - 1% 9% 34% 45% 11%
27 LIU Eric Y. - 1% 9% 28% 38% 21% 3%
28 LEE Jonah 2% 14% 31% 33% 16% 4% -
29 BADLANI Dev 2% 12% 28% 33% 19% 5% -
30 ZHEN Ethan - 2% 11% 33% 37% 15% 2%
31 KNIZHNIK David - 1% 8% 28% 40% 22% 2%
32 ORVANANOS Jorge - - 3% 14% 32% 36% 14%
33 YAO Bradley - 1% 10% 28% 37% 21% 4%
34 DAI Jonathan T. - - - 4% 19% 43% 34%
35 PLASTARAS Trey - 4% 22% 38% 27% 7% -
36 LIN James G. - - 3% 18% 40% 33% 6%
36 SIMA Congyu Josh 3% 15% 31% 32% 16% 4% -
38 JIANG Owen - - 1% 8% 28% 41% 21%
39 KUSHNIR Aden N. - 8% 28% 37% 21% 5% -
40 ORLOV Dmitriy 5% 20% 33% 28% 12% 2% -
41 GUO Sean - 3% 17% 38% 31% 10% 1%
42 MA Bryant 1% 9% 27% 35% 21% 6% 1%
43 SONG Austin - 9% 29% 36% 21% 5% -
44 KLOTZ Isaiah 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1% -
45 MARX Jackson L. - - 3% 15% 34% 36% 12%
46 WONG Antonio - 2% 11% 27% 34% 21% 4%
47 WANG Winston 1% 11% 34% 35% 15% 3% -
48 UNGERER Roger M. 1% 8% 31% 38% 19% 4% -
49 GUO Justin 4% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2% -
50 MA Andrew - 1% 7% 24% 38% 26% 4%
51 LI Ayren 4% 23% 41% 26% 5% -
52 NICOLL James 11% 38% 36% 13% 2% -
53 LI Aaron - 1% 10% 36% 38% 14% 1%
54 SENIC Lucas 1% 6% 24% 37% 25% 7% 1%
55 CO Dylan 5% 26% 40% 22% 5% - -
55 PAN Henry 19% 41% 29% 9% 1% - -
57 LING Eddie 6% 23% 34% 25% 10% 2% -
58 WANG Jackson - 4% 19% 36% 29% 10% 1%
59 WONG Jackson - 16% 38% 32% 12% 2% -
60 XU Andy P. 1% 6% 21% 35% 27% 9% 1%
60 LIU Ryan 20% 38% 29% 11% 2% - -
62 REZA Farazi 1% 10% 29% 35% 19% 5% -
63 RNO Kyler 38% 43% 16% 2% - - -
64 LIU Derek 2% 11% 27% 34% 21% 6% -
65 AUGUSTINE Aaron A. - 5% 19% 35% 29% 10% 1%
66 CHEN Kyle P. 3% 16% 32% 30% 15% 3% -
67 HAN Derek - 1% 12% 32% 38% 16% 1%
68 XU Ethan 4% 21% 37% 28% 9% 1% -
68 ZHUANG Chuanxuan 16% 37% 32% 13% 3% - -
70 TANG August L. 3% 17% 32% 30% 14% 3% -
71 WHELAN Alexander H. 14% 41% 32% 11% 2% - -
71 BOBROW Silas - 8% 41% 37% 12% 2% -
73 NICOLL William 5% 20% 34% 28% 11% 2% -
74 KOVACS Wyatt 3% 16% 33% 31% 14% 3% -
75 AGRAWAL Niki 7% 39% 38% 14% 2% - -
76 KALIPERSAD Neil A. 1% 11% 35% 38% 13% 1%
77 LEWIS Akhil - 8% 29% 37% 21% 5% -
78 WU Lucas - 6% 25% 38% 24% 6% 1%
79 HONG Issac - 2% 12% 32% 36% 16% 2%
80 ALLEN Henry G. 5% 22% 34% 26% 10% 2% -
81 TORRES Treston 1% 8% 25% 35% 24% 7% 1%
82 LEE Brendan 3% 16% 33% 31% 14% 3% -
83 HUANG Eythan 30% 41% 22% 6% 1% - -
84 MILLER Jordan 7% 25% 35% 23% 8% 1% -
85 PALMA Nathan Anthony 1% 11% 32% 35% 17% 3% -
86 WEN Ethan 9% 42% 35% 12% 2% - -
87 LI Allen 39% 42% 16% 3% - - -
88 ZHOU Leon 4% 22% 36% 27% 10% 2% -
89 XU Dinghui Ryan 46% 47% 7% - - - -
89 SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn 6% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
91 SHAO Eric 1% 12% 33% 35% 16% 3% -
91 ARICO Trey 2% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3% -
93 SIMON Luke 21% 42% 28% 8% 1% - -
94 XIA Eric 78% 20% 2% - - - -
95 WUN Jonathan 13% 34% 34% 16% 3% - -
96 TANG Alexander L. 3% 16% 32% 30% 15% 3% -
97 SORSAIA John 43% 42% 13% 2% - -
98 DERRICK Blake < 1% 5% 21% 36% 28% 9% 1%
99 HIGGASON Hugh 67% 29% 4% - - - -
100 MAGALONG William 18% 40% 31% 10% 1% - -
101 EDELMAN Aaron 93% 7% - - - - -
102 TANG Albert 12% 40% 35% 11% 2% - -
102 CHUNG Ian 63% 31% 5% - - - -
104 CHO Xzander 38% 52% 9% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.