Meadowlands Exposition Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
2 | LI Richard | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 58% |
3 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
3 | WU Alexander | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
5 | LEE Jacob J | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 26% |
6 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 29% |
7 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
8 | LEE Aidan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 45% | 23% |
9 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 61% | |
10 | SIU Aiden | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
11 | KIM Yonjae | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
12 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% |
13 | ANTON Nathaniel | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 16% |
13 | CHENG Jonathan | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
15 | MARX Oscar L. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
16 | OH Sean | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 18% |
17 | ZHAI Jeffrey | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
17 | AHN Jun | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
19 | WANG Mason | - | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
20 | SONG Bryan | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
21 | PO Oliver | - | - | 7% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 2% |
22 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 36% | 33% | 8% |
23 | WECHSLER Jacob | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
24 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
25 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
26 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 45% | 11% | |
27 | LIU Eric Y. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
28 | LEE Jonah | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
29 | BADLANI Dev | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
30 | ZHEN Ethan | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
31 | KNIZHNIK David | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 2% |
32 | ORVANANOS Jorge | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 14% |
33 | YAO Bradley | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
34 | DAI Jonathan T. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
35 | PLASTARAS Trey | - | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | - |
36 | LIN James G. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 33% | 6% |
36 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
38 | JIANG Owen | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
39 | KUSHNIR Aden N. | - | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
40 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
41 | GUO Sean | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
42 | MA Bryant | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
43 | SONG Austin | - | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
44 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
45 | MARX Jackson L. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 36% | 12% |
46 | WONG Antonio | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 4% |
47 | WANG Winston | 1% | 11% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
48 | UNGERER Roger M. | 1% | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
49 | GUO Justin | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
50 | MA Andrew | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 4% |
51 | LI Ayren | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% | - | |
52 | NICOLL James | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
53 | LI Aaron | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 38% | 14% | 1% |
54 | SENIC Lucas | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
55 | CO Dylan | 5% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
55 | PAN Henry | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
57 | LING Eddie | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
58 | WANG Jackson | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
59 | WONG Jackson | - | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
60 | XU Andy P. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
60 | LIU Ryan | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
62 | REZA Farazi | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
63 | RNO Kyler | 38% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
64 | LIU Derek | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
65 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
66 | CHEN Kyle P. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
67 | HAN Derek | - | 1% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 1% |
68 | XU Ethan | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
68 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
70 | TANG August L. | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
71 | WHELAN Alexander H. | 14% | 41% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
71 | BOBROW Silas | - | 8% | 41% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
73 | NICOLL William | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
74 | KOVACS Wyatt | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
75 | AGRAWAL Niki | 7% | 39% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
76 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 1% | 11% | 35% | 38% | 13% | 1% | |
77 | LEWIS Akhil | - | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
78 | WU Lucas | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
79 | HONG Issac | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
80 | ALLEN Henry G. | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
81 | TORRES Treston | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
82 | LEE Brendan | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
83 | HUANG Eythan | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
84 | MILLER Jordan | 7% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
85 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
86 | WEN Ethan | 9% | 42% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
87 | LI Allen | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
88 | ZHOU Leon | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
89 | XU Dinghui Ryan | 46% | 47% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
89 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
91 | SHAO Eric | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
91 | ARICO Trey | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
93 | SIMON Luke | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
94 | XIA Eric | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
95 | WUN Jonathan | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
96 | TANG Alexander L. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
97 | SORSAIA John | 43% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
98 | DERRICK Blake | < 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
99 | HIGGASON Hugh | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
100 | MAGALONG William | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
101 | EDELMAN Aaron | 93% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
102 | TANG Albert | 12% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
102 | CHUNG Ian | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
104 | CHO Xzander | 38% | 52% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.