Meadowlands Exposition Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JEYOON Ryan S. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
2 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% | |
3 | SU Caleb | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
3 | IARIKOV Nicholas | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% |
5 | LEE Daniel Y. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
6 | LIEF Isaac R. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% | |
6 | GAO Daniel | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 15% | |
8 | BASOK Nikita | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
9 | KOKENGE Reid | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
10 | KATS Dylan G. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
11 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% | |
12 | CAO Brad | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 15% | |
13 | KNOX James | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | |
14 | JUN Jaywu | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 29% | |
15 | KUMAR Aidan | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% | |
16 | MACARTY Jordan T. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
17 | KOBI Samuel | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% |
18 | BINDAS Odinn A. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
19 | LEE Samuel Y. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
20 | BORODITSKY Ethan | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
21 | LEE Noah | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
22 | SHCHUR Landon | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% |
23 | SHOUSHA Yassin | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
24 | PARK Frederick | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
25 | SKORUPAN Grant | 1% | 9% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
26 | SUN James H. | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
27 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | - | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
28 | CAO Albert | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 7% | |
29 | BEZRODNOV Michael | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
30 | DUAN Eric | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
31 | PARK Nicholas | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
32 | SINGH Aryaman | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
33 | DODIN David | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% |
34 | XIE Brandon | 5% | 26% | 41% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
35 | CHEN Jun Ho | 1% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
36 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
37 | WANG Max S | 17% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
37 | ARAVIND Athreya | 7% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
39 | CHAMBLISS Logan C. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
40 | GONG Haixiang | 3% | 20% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
41 | WU Jonathan | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
42 | SINGH Ravin | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
43 | MAHESH Tarun | 2% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
44 | BRODSKY Julian | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
45 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
46 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
47 | POIST Wylie | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
48 | SONN Rohan | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
49 | AGARWAL Adheesh | 7% | 39% | 37% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
50 | WEN Ethan | 17% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
51 | LOISEAU Eliott | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 4% | |
51 | WU Colin | 7% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
53 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
54 | ZHANG Ethan | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
55 | ZHANG Andy | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
56 | REDDY Arya | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
57 | HU Robert J. | 27% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
58 | ALI Farhan | 33% | 44% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
59 | KRISHNAN Skanda | 72% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | |
60 | MALHAM Andrew | 28% | 47% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
61 | SOBOLEWSKI Liam | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | |
62 | EDELMAN Aaron | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
62 | TRULL A.J. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
64 | MAO Benjamin | 21% | 44% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
65 | BRADSHAW Carter | 43% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
66 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.