King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | YUROVCHAK Andrew T. | D V V D | V V V V V V | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
2 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | V V D D | V V V V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
3 | GOHEL Dayus T. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
3 | TUCKER Owen J. | D V V D V | V V V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
5 | SMITH Nicholas S. | V V V V | V V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
6 | JIN Alexander | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
7 | KUMAR Anitya | V V D D V | V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
8 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | D D V V V | V V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
9 | WU Joseph | V V V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
10 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | V D V V | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
11 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | V V D V | V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
12 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | V V D V D | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
13 | FELDMAN Jaemin | D D V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
13 | GAO Daniel | V V V D D | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
15 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | V D D V D | V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
16 | JIN Owen | D V D D V | V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
17 | PARK Ian C. | V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
18 | MORSE Tyler | V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
19 | AGAON Ethan | D V V V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
20 | PARK Brian | V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
21 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | V V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
22 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
23 | DOLMETSCH Max | D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
24 | SHEN Max | V V D V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
25 | SIMPSON Patrick | V V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
26 | SHIV Rishi | V D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
27 | KIM Byung | D D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
28 | SJOSTEDT Jacob H. | D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
29 | KROPP Jack | D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
30 | SINGH Aryaman | D V D D V | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
31 | LI Jalen | V D D D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
32 | MARRAN Erik R. | D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
33 | SITBON-TAYLOR Noe B. | V V V V D | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
34 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | V D V V V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
35 | PARK Frederick | V D V V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
36 | LEHR William D. | D V V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
37 | RHYU Kozmo | V D D V V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
38 | KOKENGE Reid | V D V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
39 | DIXON Thomas | V D V V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
40 | MACARTY Jordan T. | D V V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
41 | AGAON Shawn | V D V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
42 | MISHIMA Torata | V V V D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
43 | PAHLAVI Kamran | D D V V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
44 | CHOI Mason | V V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
45 | POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. | V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
46 | JEYOON Ryan S. | D D V D V | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
47 | CHEN Eric | V V D D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
48 | MAGDA Daniel | D V V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
49 | ZHAO corey | D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
50 | STALL-RYAN Jonathan | D D D V V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
51 | DISIMONE David Z. | D V D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
51 | CHOE Andrew | D D V D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
53 | WU Jonathan | D V V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
54 | PRIHODKO Max | D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
55 | ZHAO Luhan | D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
56 | MARTINEZ Joshua | D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
57 | KUMAR Aidan | D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
58 | BINDAS Odinn A. | D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
59 | WHITEHURST JJ | V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
59 | LI Jeffrey | D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
61 | LEE Seungwon | V D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
62 | MCCRACKEN Dylan | D D D D V | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
63 | LAI Coby | D D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
64 | ZHANG William | D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
65 | HU Robert J. | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
66 | GONG Haixiang | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
67 | MAHESH Tarun | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
68 | FENG du | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.