Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHANG Daniel D. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 44% |
2 | EMMER Chase T. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
3 | LI Brandon H. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
3 | NDIAYE Edriss G. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 46% |
5 | LOUIE Bryce | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 76% |
6 | NAGIMOV Marsel | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% |
7 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | - | 6% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 3% |
8 | CHEN James P. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% |
9 | BINDER Zachary (Zach) B. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
10 | XIAO Enoch A. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
11 | HAMILTON Bogdan A. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 38% | |
12 | KUMBLA Samarth | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 12% | |
13 | YU Vinni | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 39% | |
14 | OURSLER Jack | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
15 | HUTH Mitchell | - | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
16 | KIM Nicholas W. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
17 | XIAO Ethan J. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
18 | BAS Liam | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
19 | KASI Sanjay | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
19 | LEVY Jacob M. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 10% |
19 | KO Brian J. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
22 | ZHENG Alan H. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 2% |
23 | LIN Richard W. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
24 | CHEN Andrew | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 34% | 4% |
25 | KWON Ethan | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
26 | YU Eric W. | - | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 41% | 36% |
27 | DICKSON Farr R. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
28 | SONG Lawrence (Larry) | - | - | 4% | 25% | 46% | 25% | |
28 | UM Ethan A. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
30 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
31 | GOOR Julian | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
32 | MITCHELL Philip D. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 17% | 2% |
33 | CHUNG Andrew N. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% |
34 | VOGLER Justin K. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
35 | ZUSIN Zachary W. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 33% |
35 | LIAO Jun Heng (James) | - | - | - | - | 2% | 29% | 69% |
37 | TSANG Matthew K. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
38 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
39 | LIU Justin | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
40 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
41 | ZHANG Andy W. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
42 | CULLIVAN Justice | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
43 | LIU Patrick | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
44 | WU Alexander | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
45 | LIMA Kevin M. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% |
45 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
47 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 6% |
48 | KIM Brandon J. | - | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | |
49 | LI Richard | - | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | |
50 | DANKAR Neel | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
51 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
52 | CHENG Matthew S. | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
53 | STANLEY Mason B. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
54 | XIAO Leon (Ruibo) | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
55 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
56 | JANG Jaewon | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
57 | SINGH Dayaal | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
58 | CHEN Allen | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
59 | ZHANG Henry C. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
60 | MARTINEZ Donavyn E. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 8% |
61 | ZHAO Jason L. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
62 | LIN Dashiell | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
63 | EUSCHER Alex M. | - | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
64 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% | |
65 | MORAIS Paulo | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 42% | 14% | |
66 | CHEN Ziyuan | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 60% | 18% |
67 | GRIFFIN John O. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 24% |
68 | PARK Luke J. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
69 | WU Jerry Z. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
70 | KELLY William J. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 36% | 12% |
70 | DIERKS Kian | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
72 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
73 | LIU Niles J. | - | - | 5% | 28% | 46% | 21% | |
74 | OH Jonathan | 7% | 26% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
75 | WONG Adam L. | - | 1% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 13% | |
76 | LI Raphael C. | - | 2% | 17% | 41% | 33% | 8% | |
77 | STRUGAR Marcus A. | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
78 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
78 | LAO Scott E. | - | 3% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
80 | ONIK Elijah T. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 28% | 3% |
81 | LI Jiaan | - | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
82 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | - | 5% | 26% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - |
83 | KORKMAZ Alp Tuna | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% |
84 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 28% | 3% |
84 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
86 | YU Anders | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
87 | YI Stephen K. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 1% |
88 | DING Jonathan | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
89 | GRANT Lachlan K. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | 1% |
90 | WU Nicholas | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
91 | MURRAY Maximo | - | 6% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
92 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 8% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
93 | HSIUNG Richie | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | - |
94 | DAVIS Christopher M. | 2% | 17% | 44% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
95 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 3% |
95 | CHIN Jason Y. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
97 | BAE Junnie | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
98 | BANERJEE ANUP | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
99 | AYUPOV Ilya | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
100 | LUH Ethan K. | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
101 | ZENG Lucas H. | - | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
102 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
103 | GRIFFITH JACK | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 11% |
103 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
105 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 2% | 17% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
106 | CHENG Jonathan | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
107 | DARIANO Noah G. | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
108 | BING Charles | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
109 | LI Simon A. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
110 | GONG Benjamin | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
111 | LI Owen | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
112 | CHENG Nathan | 11% | 48% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
113 | LO Conrad | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% | |
114 | BAE Kevin | 5% | 28% | 47% | 18% | 2% | - | |
115 | ZHANG Luke T. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
116 | WU Alexander | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 40% | 12% | |
117 | JAIN Aditya | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
118 | PAEK Alex J. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
119 | KAO Castor T. | - | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
119 | OTAKE Jared K. | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
121 | GAO William | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
122 | KIM Yonjae | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | - |
123 | DAI Jonathan T. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
124 | LEE Aidan | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
125 | OH Samuel H. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
126 | CHIN Julian S. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
127 | KIM Aaron J. | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
128 | SONG Leonardo T. | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 2% |
129 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | - |
130 | SICHITIU Alexander | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
131 | LEE Chris | 2% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
132 | BRUK Peter J. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
133 | YANG Luao | - | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 32% | 5% |
134 | JEON Caleb A. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
135 | WYMAN Julian | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
136 | GRISWOLD Abel B. | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
137 | NAGER Noah | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
138 | KIM Andrew J. | 5% | 23% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
139 | GODZHIK Zachary | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
140 | TAN Christien | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
141 | DIVITO Dylan | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
142 | EVGENEV Mark | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
143 | WESTPHAL David R. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
144 | SHA Yi Peng | 3% | 18% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
145 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
146 | VAZQUEZ Zander | 1% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - |
147 | RINEHART Conner M. | 3% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
148 | JIANG Owen | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
148 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
150 | WU Conrad J. | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
151 | PATINO Yahir | 16% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
152 | TAN Peter | 24% | 50% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
153 | SHERMAN Marco J. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
153 | KIM Banseok J. | 20% | 48% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
155 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
156 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 23% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
157 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
158 | XIAO EDWARD | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
159 | TANG Owen S. | 16% | 52% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
160 | WANG Ethan | 38% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
161 | ZHENG zhe | 28% | 49% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
162 | CAI Jason Zhicheng | 18% | 44% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
163 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | 30% | 49% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
164 | THAI William | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
165 | HODESS Ethan | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
166 | ZHOU Oscar J. | 12% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
167 | FU Samuel Y. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
167 | DINSAY Kristjan | 35% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
169 | KIM Jackson | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
170 | WONG Adrian | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
171 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
172 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 9% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
172 | LIN Michael | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
174 | GATZA Logan | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
174 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
176 | MILLER Duncan R. | 11% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
176 | PO Oliver | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
176 | GOGOI Vir K. | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
176 | JI Aidan Y. | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
180 | JORDON Kaleb W. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
181 | NAM Michael | 54% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
182 | BERNABE Rafael | 65% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
183 | LI Avery Peihong | 9% | 58% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
184 | OH Jaden | 51% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
185 | LE Jacob W. | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
186 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 35% | 47% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
187 | REYES Omar | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
188 | HAN Andersen Y. | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
188 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 60% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
190 | SEAL Maximus R. | 45% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
191 | BERK Theodore | 16% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
192 | NGUYEN William | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
193 | KIM Isaiah G. | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
193 | UPTON Craig | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
195 | UZGIRIS Kovas | 26% | 45% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
195 | BAEK David | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
195 | LIM Charles Q. | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
198 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
199 | LI Ryan Z. | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
200 | GALLUCCI Charles John | 13% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
201 | HSIAO Nicholas | 46% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
202 | ZHEN Ethan | 11% | 46% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
202 | MILLER Chance | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
204 | CHUANG Kian J. | 21% | 50% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.