Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 2 | IARIKOV Nicholas | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 41% | 19% |
| 3 | KATS Dylan G. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 3 | FU Leon | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 5 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% | |
| 6 | LEE Samuel Y. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 49% |
| 7 | KHANNA Nikhil | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 8 | LO Jake | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% |
| 9 | ZHENG Andy | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% | |
| 10 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 11 | WANG zhixing (Daniel） | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
| 12 | SCHIEK Harrison | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
| 13 | KIM Nathan | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
| 14 | DODIN David | - | - | 1% | 13% | 45% | 41% | |
| 14 | FAN Jackson | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
| 16 | BRODSKY Julian | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 17 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | - | - | 4% | 23% | 49% | 24% | |
| 18 | HAMZA Tudor | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 37% | 10% |
| 19 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 20 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 21 | SILVERS Ari | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 21 | SU Caleb | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 23 | LAI Boden | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 24 | YUE Hongrui | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
| 25 | ZI QIN Shang | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 42% | 17% |
| 26 | HEADRICK Lance | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
| 27 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 28 | RUBIN Daniel | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 29 | KARNAS Karol | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 30 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 31 | BORISENKO Samuel | 16% | 45% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | CHIN Dylan A. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
| 33 | LEE Aiden | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | SHAN Junzhe | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 8% |
| 35 | KIM Jayden | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | YANG Boyan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
| 37 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 38 | CHOI Zachary | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 39 | MITEV Alexander | - | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 40 | WOLFE Alex | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% |
| 41 | ESKRIDGE Caleb | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 6% |
| 42 | SAUNIER Cameron | 1% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | HU Anton | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | ZHAI Avalo | - | 6% | 30% | 45% | 18% | 2% | |
| 45 | DONAHUE Lake | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 46 | ZHENG Jerry | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
| 46 | YU Austin | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | MIAO KUNQI | - | 15% | 45% | 32% | 7% | - | |
| 49 | LI Zachary | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 50 | PARK Nicholas | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
| 51 | NAKAS Levent | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 52 | KIM Ian | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 53 | MAO Benjamin | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 54 | LAM Alan | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 55 | XIAO Hanzhi （Shawn） | - | 2% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 56 | SINGH Ravin | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 57 | LIU Yikun | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 58 | BARG Jonathan | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 59 | SIEDOW William | 44% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 60 | KIM Minjae | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 61 | CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 62 | CHUNG Andrew | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 63 | XIONG Aaron | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 64 | NOFZIGER Bennett | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 65 | ROMANOV Ethan | - | 2% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 66 | COLEMAN Ian | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 67 | FANG Hanning | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
| 68 | KANG EUNWOO | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 69 | ALI Farhan | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 70 | LEE JiYuen | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 71 | MODANLOU Navid | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 72 | LOISEAU Oscar | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 73 | HUANG Kenneth | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 74 | TRULL A.J. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 75 | DONG Haiyi | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
| 76 | SONG Troy | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 77 | LIOZNYANSKY Miron | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 78 | JAIN Samyak | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | - |
| 79 | XIA Dashan | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 80 | CHAI Ethan | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 81 | LIN Zizhen | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 82 | ZHAO Zidong | 9% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 83 | MALHAM Andrew | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 84 | ZIEGLER John | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 85 | JIANG Matthew | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 86 | KIM Matthew | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 87 | VUILLEMIN Gregoire | 4% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 88 | PAN Anthony | 41% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 89 | DHAL Leon | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 89 | NAEMI Barsam | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 91 | BHATT Arjun | 12% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 92 | SAVORETTI Pietro | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 93 | JOHNSON Soren | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 94 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 95 | QIU William | 87% | 12% | - | - | - | - | |
| 96 | PAN Tristan | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 97 | KUGLER Luke | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 98 | GINZBURG Adam | 1% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 99 | KUANG Bryan | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 100 | WANG Joey | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 101 | GOROZA Eric | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 102 | LEE Inwoo | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 103 | MILEY Walker | 55% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 104 | TESFAYE Elias | 4% | 47% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 105 | GRAVES Lawson | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 106 | O'LONGAIGH Sunkhar | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 107 | LIANG Eric | 15% | 42% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 108 | LIPPMAN Jake | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 109 | TWEMLOW Sacha | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 109 | REID Wesley | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 111 | BLACK Zachary | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 112 | SUN Neo | 82% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.