Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
2 | IARIKOV Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 19% |
3 | KATS Dylan G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
3 | FU Leon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
5 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | |
6 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% |
7 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
8 | LO Jake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 33% |
9 | ZHENG Andy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% | |
10 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
11 | WANG zhixing (Daniel) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
12 | SCHIEK Harrison | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | |
13 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
14 | DODIN David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 41% | |
14 | FAN Jackson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
16 | BRODSKY Julian | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
17 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 24% | |
18 | HAMZA Tudor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 10% |
19 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% | |
20 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
21 | SILVERS Ari | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
21 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
23 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
24 | YUE Hongrui | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
25 | ZI QIN Shang | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 17% |
26 | HEADRICK Lance | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
27 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
28 | RUBIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
29 | KARNAS Karol | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
30 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
31 | BORISENKO Samuel | 100% | 84% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
32 | CHIN Dylan A. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% | |
33 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
34 | SHAN Junzhe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 8% |
35 | KIM Jayden | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
36 | YANG Boyan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 23% |
37 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
38 | CHOI Zachary | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
39 | MITEV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
40 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
41 | ESKRIDGE Caleb | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 6% |
42 | SAUNIER Cameron | 100% | 99% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
43 | HU Anton | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
44 | ZHAI Avalo | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 20% | 2% | |
45 | DONAHUE Lake | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
46 | ZHENG Jerry | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
46 | YU Austin | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
48 | MIAO KUNQI | 100% | 100% | 85% | 40% | 8% | - | |
49 | LI Zachary | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 6% | |
50 | PARK Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
51 | NAKAS Levent | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
52 | KIM Ian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
53 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
54 | LAM Alan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
55 | XIAO Hanzhi (Shawn) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
56 | SINGH Ravin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
57 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
58 | BARG Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
59 | SIEDOW William | 100% | 56% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
60 | KIM Minjae | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% | |
61 | CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
62 | CHUNG Andrew | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
63 | XIONG Aaron | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
64 | NOFZIGER Bennett | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
65 | ROMANOV Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 3% |
66 | COLEMAN Ian | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
67 | FANG Hanning | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
68 | KANG EUNWOO | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
69 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
70 | LEE JiYuen | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
71 | MODANLOU Navid | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
72 | LOISEAU Oscar | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
73 | HUANG Kenneth | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
74 | TRULL A.J. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
75 | DONG Haiyi | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
76 | SONG Troy | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
77 | LIOZNYANSKY Miron | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
78 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | - |
79 | XIA Dashan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
80 | CHAI Ethan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
81 | LIN Zizhen | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
82 | ZHAO Zidong | 100% | 91% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
83 | MALHAM Andrew | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
84 | ZIEGLER John | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
85 | JIANG Matthew | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
86 | KIM Matthew | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
87 | VUILLEMIN Gregoire | 100% | 96% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
88 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
89 | DHAL Leon | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
89 | NAEMI Barsam | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
91 | BHATT Arjun | 100% | 88% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
92 | SAVORETTI Pietro | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
93 | JOHNSON Soren | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
94 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | |
95 | QIU William | 100% | 13% | - | - | - | - | |
96 | PAN Tristan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
97 | KUGLER Luke | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
98 | GINZBURG Adam | 100% | 99% | 86% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
99 | KUANG Bryan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
100 | WANG Joey | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
101 | GOROZA Eric | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
102 | LEE Inwoo | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
103 | MILEY Walker | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
104 | TESFAYE Elias | 100% | 96% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | |
105 | GRAVES Lawson | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
106 | O'LONGAIGH Sunkhar | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
107 | LIANG Eric | 100% | 85% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
108 | LIPPMAN Jake | 100% | 73% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
109 | TWEMLOW Sacha | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
109 | REID Wesley | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
111 | BLACK Zachary | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
112 | SUN Neo | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.