Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | V V V D V | V V V V V V | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
2 | LEE Seungwon | D D V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
3 | HABIB Farooq | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
3 | BOUMEDIENNE Sami | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
5 | RHYU Kozmo | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
6 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | V V V V D V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
7 | GAO Chaney C. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
8 | JAKLITSCH Michael (Mike) T. | D V V V D D | V V V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
9 | JIN Daniel | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
10 | MOSES Alexander | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
11 | WELDON Benjamin | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
12 | LI Patrick | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
13 | JONES Caleb | V D V V D | V V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
14 | RAJ Shrey | V D V D V D | V V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
15 | COHEN Benjamin A. | V D D V D V | V V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
16 | FU Leon | D D D V V V | V V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
17 | STRAUSS Luke | V V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
18 | ALLEN Graham | V V V V V V | V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
19 | WATT Darren | V V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
20 | CHIEN Brandon | V V V V V D | V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
21 | PARK Elliot | D V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
22 | LIU Andrew | V V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
23 | SARKAR Anish | V D V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
24 | MA Victor | D D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
25 | KNUDSEN Travis | V D D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
26 | SINHA Zaan | D V V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
27 | DAO Alexander | D D V V V | V D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
28 | KIM Benjamin I. | D V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
29 | PERKA Michael | V D V D V D | V V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
30 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | D D V D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
31 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | D D D D D V | V V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
32 | KIM Sullivan | D D D D V D | V V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
33 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | V V V V V V | D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
34 | CASTELLY Luke | V V V V D V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
35 | ZHANG Nathan | V V V D V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
36 | BENACK Steven M. | V V V D V V | D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
37 | ZACHES Torrey | V V V D D V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
38 | PAN Tristan | D V V D V V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
39 | SIRBU Dan | V D D V V V | D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
40 | ZHANG Alec | D V D V V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
41 | RYAN Seth C. | V V D V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
42 | DENNIS Ethan | V V D V D V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
43 | LIU Yikun | V V D V V D | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
44 | MADSEN Jr Eric W. | V D D V V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
45 | CHU Allan | D V D V V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
46 | EVERS Gabriel | V D V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
47 | TORRES Nicolas | V D V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
48 | LEE Chun Po | D V V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
49 | MENDOZA Zachari | D V D D V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
50 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | V V V D D D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
51 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | V V D D D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
52 | ALI Adam | V D V D V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
53 | WANG owen | V V D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
54 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | V V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
55 | BARNETT Devin | V D D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
56 | LO Jake | V D D D D V | V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
57 | LOFTUS Luca | D D V V D D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
58 | CHIEN Zachary M. | D V D D V D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
59 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | D D D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
60 | KUO Rylan | D D V V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
61 | RYAN Christopher | D D D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
62 | MING Nathan | V V D D D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
63 | NALBANDIAN VAHAN P. | D D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
64 | HE Zhiheng | D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
65 | MCADOO Declan | V D V D V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
66 | CLAES Lucas | D V V V D D | D | 0.7 | 3 | +2.3 |
67 | CROSSMAN Brandon | D V D V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
68 | ELZAYN Hadi S. | D V D V D D | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
69 | LIU Noah | V D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
69 | OU wei | D D V D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
71 | MIAO KUNQI | V V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
72 | GENCHEV Madav | V D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
73 | LEE JiYuen | D D D V D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
74 | MARTIN Charles | D D V D D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
75 | CHOI Kaiden I. | D V V D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
76 | GAO Zachary | V D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
77 | MENDOZA Zandro | D D V D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
78 | KONG Martin C. | D D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
79 | BUERGISSER Kai | D V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
79 | BURLING Trenor | D D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
81 | FANG Hanning | D D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
82 | BEAVER Aaron | D V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
83 | JU Hanul | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
84 | CAMPBELL Kenneth | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
84 | LIPTON Michael D. | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
84 | RAHMAN Yousef | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
87 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
88 | TETALI Vishwanath | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
89 | LI zerong | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
90 | CHANG Kristopher | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.