SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JIN Owen | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 2 | RHYU Kozmo | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
| 3 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 3 | BEZRODNOV Michael | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 5 | HE Lawrence | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 6 | LEE Noah | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 43% | |
| 7 | KOKENGE Reid | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 46% | 21% | |
| 8 | MAHESH Tarun | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 10 | IARIKOV Nicholas | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
| 11 | BASOK Nikita | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% |
| 11 | ZHANG YuJian | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% |
| 13 | LEE Seungwon | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 41% | 13% | |
| 14 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% | |
| 15 | GAO Daniel | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 14% |
| 16 | KUMAR Aidan | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 17 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | - | - | - | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% |
| 18 | PERSAUD Daivik | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 3% |
| 19 | AGAON Shawn | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
| 20 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 21 | OSTIGUY Cameron | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 22 | LAI Aedin | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
| 23 | PARK Frederick | - | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 24 | JUN Jaywu | - | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 25 | CHOI Aleksey | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | ARAVIND Athreya | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 27 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 37% | 12% | |
| 28 | MISHIMA Torata | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 21% | |
| 29 | CHAWLA Armaan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% |
| 30 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 31 | MAO Benjamin | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% | |
| 32 | KRISHNAN Skanda | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 33 | RICHARD Owen | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% | |
| 34 | KNOX James | - | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% |
| 35 | DORASZELSKI Mark | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 2% | |
| 36 | AGAON Ethan | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% |
| 37 | KOBI Samuel | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
| 38 | WU Jonathan | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 39 | PARK Nicholas | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% | |
| 40 | SHA Michael | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 41 | SUN Jeffery | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 42 | MARTINEZ Joshua | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 43 | WOLFSOHN Peleg | 1% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 44 | REDDY Arya | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | SUN Jason | 1% | 11% | 34% | 38% | 14% | 2% | |
| 46 | SUN James H. | 10% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | WU Colin | 11% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | QUINLAN Sean | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 49 | SERAFIN Ben | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 49 | DUSSEAU Maddax | 19% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 3% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 52 | NGUYEN Damien | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 53 | HU Robert J. | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | WONG King-Yee | 24% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 55 | REPIC Oliver | 16% | 44% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | THAKUR Om S. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 57 | LAI Boden | 5% | 28% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 58 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 3% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 59 | LIU Ethan | 35% | 47% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 60 | SINGH Jaysukh | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 61 | POCHATKO Christian | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 62 | ZHANG Ethan | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 63 | SOSNICK Samuel | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 64 | JIANG Matthew | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 65 | GORTI Agustya | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 66 | TING Max | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 67 | ZOU Xianyang (Max) | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 68 | PAN Anthony | 17% | 48% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 69 | SOKOL Luke | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | ZHAO Jordan | 7% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 71 | LI David | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 72 | XIE Brandon | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 73 | MCGRANE-MOFFITT Nolan A. | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 74 | NORTON Theo B. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 75 | MCILWAIN Wesley D. | 9% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 76 | GANESAN Mathavan | 26% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 77 | VON BARTESCH Rudolf | 11% | 42% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | GARCIACABRERA Jeffrey | 38% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 79 | HERTZOG Ben | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.