The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% |
2 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 30% | |
3 | BOYCE Samuel H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
3 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
5 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
6 | ELZAYN Hadi S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% | 1% |
7 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
8 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
9 | MADISON Ethan S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% |
10 | PETROLL Jared P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | |
11 | SODERBERG Alex Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
12 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 23% | |
13 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
14 | HOFMAN Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 15% | 1% |
15 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% | |
16 | STCLAIR Jake | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
17 | ULINICH Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
18 | JAIN Sarthak | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
19 | JONES Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
20 | PERKINS-OLLILA Justin W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
21 | NICHOLSON Dimitri E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | 5% |
22 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
23 | PARK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 2% |
24 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 27% |
25 | SCHINDLER Sergey M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% | 1% |
26 | RAJ Shrey | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
27 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | - |
28 | MA Victor | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | 4% | |
29 | FU Leon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | 4% | |
30 | SMITH Justin C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 7% |
31 | ALLEN Graham | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 39% | |
32 | HELGE James R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 5% |
33 | LOGUE Ethan D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 12% |
34 | TEPEDELENLIOGLU Mehmet | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
35 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
36 | PHILIPPINE Matthias A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
37 | PALACIOS Justin M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
38 | LEE Chun Po | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
39 | ZAYDMAN David M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | |
40 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
41 | WATT Darren | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
42 | HUSSAIN Kamran | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
43 | ZHANG Alec | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
44 | CHEN Steve | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
45 | SUVOROV Yuly | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 11% |
46 | WISHART Eric | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
47 | CHU Allan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | 9% | 1% |
48 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 94% | 66% | 25% | 4% | - | |
49 | WONG Kevin | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
50 | MARIANI Lou | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 13% |
51 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
52 | MING Nathan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - |
53 | SEO Shawn | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
54 | LOFTUS Luca | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
55 | RICHARD silas | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
56 | SCHEUERMANN Andrew G. | 100% | 95% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - | |
57 | HADLEY Daniel K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 22% | 2% |
58 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | - |
59 | ZHANG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
60 | TANG William | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
61 | YUEN Nathan | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
62 | LEE Jayden J. | 100% | 96% | 70% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
63 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - | |
64 | GU Aidan | 100% | 96% | 68% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
65 | CHOI Zachary | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
66 | ZACHES Torrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 4% |
67 | LIPTON Michael D. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
68 | LIU Felix | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | - |
69 | WELDON Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 8% | |
70 | LI Ethan R. | 100% | 73% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
71 | KONG Martin C. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
72 | LAURIMAA Emil | 100% | 81% | 38% | 8% | - | - | |
73 | TONG Samuel | 100% | 82% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
74 | AHMED Saheer | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
75 | HARGROVE Charles | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
76 | BURLING Trenor | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
77 | LEVENTAL Mark | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
78 | GENCHEV Madav | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
79 | LUONG Allen | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
80 | CHANG Andrew | 100% | 88% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
81 | LOOK Edward | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
82 | WONG Ethan | 100% | 85% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
83 | GUPTA Karan | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
84 | BAGCHI Aritra | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
85 | ROOD Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
86 | STOCK Jordan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
87 | HOOPES Jr. Richard R. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
88 | LAI Alexander | 100% | 83% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
89 | PERALTA Christian | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
90 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 100% | 60% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
91 | CHENG Zijun | 100% | 95% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
92 | PEPPER Alexander | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
93 | SLOAN Ryan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
94 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
95 | HE Zhiheng | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
96 | SIRBU Dan | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
97 | NICHOLSON Dominic A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% | |
98 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | |
99 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 74% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
100 | RYAN Christopher | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
101 | NGUYEN Steven | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | |
101 | ZHUANG William | 100% | 91% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | |
103 | LEE Bryson | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
104 | CASTELLY Luke | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 19% | 2% | |
105 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
106 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
107 | YU Austin | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
108 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
109 | WEBB Ashton | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
110 | SIM Ian | 100% | 63% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - |
111 | WANG Xu-Chen | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
112 | HARGROVE Kai | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
113 | BAKKEN Archer | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
114 | BUFFINGTON Bryson | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
115 | NG Biwon | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | - | - | |
116 | OU wei | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
117 | HAU Peter | 100% | 75% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
118 | CLAES Lucas | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
119 | PEPPER Robert | 100% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
120 | WEBB Jeremey | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.