San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHU Max | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 45% | 15% |
| 2 | SINGHA Orion | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 3 | IMREK Samuel A. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 54% |
| 3 | JIN Nicholas | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 39% | 53% |
| 5 | KIM Darius H. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 6 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 45% | 25% | |
| 6 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 38% | 12% | |
| 8 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 9 | LIU Andrew | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 10 | LIU Felix | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 11 | WANG DEVON | - | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 7% |
| 12 | SARKAR Agniv | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | JIN daniel | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 42% | 16% | |
| 14 | DIECK Logan O. | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% | |
| 15 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | ZAYDMAN David M. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | KIM Benjamin I. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
| 18 | LIN Kyran | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% | |
| 19 | WRIGHT Christopher | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | WONG Kevin | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 25% |
| 21 | CHINN Lucas | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
| 22 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
| 23 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 24 | KIM Nathan | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 25 | JAIN Sarthak | 7% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | PARK Elliot | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 5% | |
| 27 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
| 28 | DRIBIN Ezra | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 29 | MILEY Nick N. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 30 | CHEN Bailey | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
| 31 | KOKENGE Reid | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% | |
| 32 | IMREK Elijah S. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | CHU Allan | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
| 34 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 35 | LEE Bryson | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
| 36 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
| 37 | TAMHANKAR Neil | 30% | 47% | 20% | 2% | < 1% | - | - |
| 38 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
| 39 | VEZMAR Evan H. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 40 | WILLIS Alan T. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
| 41 | LEE Seungwon | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 42 | ZHANG Alec | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 38% | 10% |
| 43 | GUPTA Karan | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 44 | MING Nathan | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 45 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% |
| 46 | ZHUANG William | - | 8% | 31% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 47 | COPEN Samuel S. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 48 | DAO Alexander | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 49 | CASTELLY Luke | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
| 50 | BAGCHI Aritra | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 51 | CAZALET George | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 52 | KHAN Muzzammil | 32% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 53 | ANDERSON Kai | 2% | 18% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 54 | CHIN Dylan A. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 55 | MONDALA Adrian | 9% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | YU Austin | 2% | 19% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 57 | PHUKAN Rohin | 24% | 47% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 58 | MALEEV Georgy | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | LAU Matthew | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 60 | ZHANG Andrew | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | FINK August | 17% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | 20% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | BRINEN-STOUT Jared P. | 34% | 43% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
| 64 | BURLING Trenor | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 65 | LIANG derek | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | ULINICH Alexander | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 67 | WANG owen | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 68 | RAJ Shrey | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 69 | KUO Rylan | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 70 | SARKAR Anish | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 71 | WATT Darren | 8% | 38% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | KATZ Matheo | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 73 | BACKHUS Ryan | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 74 | COPEN Elliot P. | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 75 | ZHANG Nathan | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 76 | CASASSOVICI Georges | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 77 | MOFFATT Bryson | 25% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | BHATT Arjun | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 79 | SINHA Zaan | 32% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 23% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | BHARGAV Angad | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 82 | YUEN Nathan | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 83 | ARUN Madhav | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 84 | KNUDSEN Travis | 5% | 28% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 85 | WANG William | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | BUERGISSER Kai | 33% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.