San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHU Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 15% |
| 2 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
| 3 | IMREK Samuel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% |
| 3 | JIN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 53% |
| 5 | KIM Darius H. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 6 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 25% | |
| 6 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 12% | |
| 8 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 5% |
| 9 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 10 | LIU Felix | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 11 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% | 7% |
| 12 | SARKAR Agniv | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | JIN daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 16% | |
| 14 | DIECK Logan O. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% | |
| 15 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | ZAYDMAN David M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
| 18 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | |
| 19 | WRIGHT Christopher | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | WONG Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 25% |
| 21 | CHINN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 6% |
| 22 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 2% |
| 23 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 24 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 25 | JAIN Sarthak | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | PARK Elliot | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 5% | |
| 27 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 28 | DRIBIN Ezra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 3% |
| 29 | MILEY Nick N. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 30 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
| 31 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% | |
| 32 | IMREK Elijah S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 33 | CHU Allan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 7% |
| 34 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 35 | LEE Bryson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 1% |
| 36 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 37 | TAMHANKAR Neil | 100% | 70% | 23% | 2% | < 1% | - | - |
| 38 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% |
| 39 | VEZMAR Evan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | |
| 40 | WILLIS Alan T. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | |
| 41 | LEE Seungwon | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
| 42 | ZHANG Alec | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 10% |
| 43 | GUPTA Karan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 44 | MING Nathan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 45 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 10% |
| 46 | ZHUANG William | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 47 | COPEN Samuel S. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 48 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 49 | CASTELLY Luke | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% | |
| 50 | BAGCHI Aritra | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 51 | CAZALET George | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 52 | KHAN Muzzammil | 100% | 68% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 53 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 54 | CHIN Dylan A. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 55 | MONDALA Adrian | 100% | 91% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | YU Austin | 100% | 98% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 57 | PHUKAN Rohin | 100% | 76% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 58 | MALEEV Georgy | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | LAU Matthew | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 60 | ZHANG Andrew | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | FINK August | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | 100% | 80% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | BRINEN-STOUT Jared P. | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 64 | BURLING Trenor | 100% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 65 | LIANG derek | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | ULINICH Alexander | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 67 | WANG owen | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 68 | RAJ Shrey | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 69 | KUO Rylan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 70 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 71 | WATT Darren | 100% | 92% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | KATZ Matheo | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 73 | BACKHUS Ryan | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 74 | COPEN Elliot P. | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 75 | ZHANG Nathan | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 76 | CASASSOVICI Georges | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 77 | MOFFATT Bryson | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | BHATT Arjun | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 79 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 68% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | BHARGAV Angad | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 82 | YUEN Nathan | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 83 | ARUN Madhav | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 84 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 95% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 85 | WANG William | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | BUERGISSER Kai | 100% | 67% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.