Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | V D V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
2 | KIM Benjamin I. | V V V D V | V V V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
3 | MOSES Alexander | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
3 | HIGGINS Branford | V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
5 | ZHENG Haoran | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
6 | STRAUSS Luke | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
7 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
8 | DOWDELL Riley | V D V D D V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
9 | LO Jake | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
10 | GAO Chaney C. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
11 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
12 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | V V D D V | V V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
13 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | D D V V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
14 | LIU Andrew | V V V D D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
15 | GAO Zachary | V D D V V D | V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
16 | FU Leon | D V D V D V | V V V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
17 | KIM Sullivan | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
18 | LIN Kyran | V D V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
19 | CROSSMAN Brandon | V V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
20 | SINGHA Orion | V D V V V V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
21 | PAN Tristan | D V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
22 | LIU Yikun | V V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
23 | KIM Nathan | D V V V V D | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
24 | OBERDERFER Vladimir | D V V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
25 | YU Austin | V V V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
26 | TIEN Jabin | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
27 | LIU Noah | D V D V V | V V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
28 | PHAM Sawyer T. | D V V D D V | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
29 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | D D D V V | V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
30 | LI Ethan R. | D D V V D | V V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
31 | PAK Elliot | D V D D D V | V V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
32 | FERRIERE Joshua | D V D D D D | V V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
33 | YUEN Nathan | V V V V V V | D | 2.7 | 6 | +3.3 |
34 | WANG zhixing (Daniel) | V V V V V | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
35 | WANG DEVON | V D V V V V | D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
36 | CHOI Kaiden I. | V V D V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
37 | MENDOZA Zachari | V V V V V D | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
37 | CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan | V V V V V D | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
39 | LUH Ethan K. | V V V V V D | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
40 | CHOI Zachary | D V V V V V | D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
41 | KNUDSEN Travis | D V D V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
42 | KHANNA Nikhil | D V D V V V | D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
43 | SCHROEDER Dylan | V V D V D V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
44 | MCADOO Declan | V V D D V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
45 | ZHU Eric | V V D V V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
46 | MULCAHY Olaf | V D D V V V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
47 | LEE Damien | D D V V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
48 | PRAKASH Hari | V V D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
49 | RICHARD silas | V D V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
50 | ZHUANG William | V V V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
51 | AVETISIAN Alexander | D D V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
52 | FANG Hanning | D D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
53 | DONAHUE Lake | V D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
54 | LEE Bryson | D D V V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
55 | SINHA Zaan | D V D D V D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
56 | CHEN Bailey | V D D D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
57 | MING Nathan | D D V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
58 | JU Hanul | V D D D V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
58 | YAO Derek (Shunyu) | D D V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
60 | WONG Ethan | D D D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
61 | WONG Preston | V D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
62 | HSU Joshua | D D V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
63 | ANDERSON Kai | D D D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
64 | HIGGINS Calvin | D D D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
65 | LEWIS Parker | V V D V D V | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
66 | KIM Andrew J. | V V V D D D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
67 | MIAO KUNQI | D D D V V V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
68 | LAI Alexander | V V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
69 | BUERGISSER Kai | D D D V V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
70 | WU Steven | D V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
71 | SIM Ian | V V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
72 | THOMAS Michael | D V D V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
73 | LIU Yueri | D D V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
74 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | D V D D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
75 | LI Yunji (Rain) | D D D V V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
76 | TONG Samuel | D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
77 | COLIS Alexandre | V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
78 | AGGELER Donovan | D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
79 | KIM Ian | D D V D D D | D | 3.7 | 1 | -2.7 |
80 | CHENG Trevor | D D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
81 | POSSON Luke | D D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
82 | GENCHEV Madav | D V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
83 | GU Aidan | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
84 | LEE Jake (JiYuen) | D D V D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
85 | LI zerong | D V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
86 | MILEY Walker | V D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
86 | CHRISTODOULIDES Martinos | D D D D D V | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
88 | SHEN Jiayi | D D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
89 | DACHELET Sawyer | D V D D D D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 | |
89 | ITO WILSON Miles | D V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
91 | BALDWIN Alexander | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
92 | ZHAO Colin | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
93 | RAMOS Max | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
94 | GUO Woody | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
95 | LIN Jason | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.