Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 13% |
| 2 | CALDERON Diego | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
| 3 | IYOKI Kent | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
| 3 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 7% |
| 5 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% |
| 6 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 4% |
| 7 | HIGGINS Branford | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% | |
| 8 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 18% |
| 9 | WRIGHT Christopher | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 10 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 11 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 13% |
| 11 | LO Jake | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | 2% |
| 13 | RONA Milan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
| 14 | TAYLOR Daryl J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% |
| 15 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 97% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 17 | GRABER Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
| 18 | RONG Yao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 19 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 8% |
| 20 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 9% |
| 21 | GAINES Aaron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 22 | WILSON Brent (Brent Wilson) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
| 23 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 28% | 6% |
| 24 | JU Hanul | 100% | 97% | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
| 25 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 26 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 27 | FU Leon | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
| 28 | WICKBOLDT Eric | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 29 | MIAO Kunqi | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | MCDANIELS Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% |
| 31 | SHARMA Sanil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 12% |
| 32 | DU Shunyu K. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 33 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 33% | 6% |
| 34 | SPROWLES Cameron D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 11% |
| 35 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 36 | WANG Owen | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | YU Austin | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 38 | WILLIAMS Terrill D. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 39 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | |
| 41 | DIECK Logan O. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
| 42 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 43 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 100% | 96% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | MING Nathan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 45 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 97% | 72% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | MA Victor | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 47 | KIM Ian | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 48 | CLAWSON Brian C. | 100% | 98% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 49 | LIPTON Jason S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 49 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 51 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | JENSEN David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% | |
| 53 | EVERS Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 54 | KURITZ Marc M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 55 | GETSLA Christopher W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
| 55 | CHIEN Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% |
| 57 | MENDOZA Zandro | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | DRAGONETTI Walter E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 23% |
| 59 | WONG Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 60 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 61 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 92% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 62 | EMMERT JP | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 63 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 64 | BAILEY Creston P. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 65 | LEE Bryson | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 66 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
| 67 | GALLO James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 68 | KIM Taeho | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | LIU Noah | 100% | 93% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | SHEN Jiayi | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 71 | UVAROV Andrii | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 72 | ZAROTSKY Ronald | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | MARSH Timothy G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 22% | 3% |
| 74 | YANG Jerry M. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 75 | CHOI San | 100% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 76 | CHIEN Zachary M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
| 77 | TANG William | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 78 | SCHROEDER Dylan | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 79 | GU Aidan | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 80 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 81 | GENCHEV Madav | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 82 | LI Zerong | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 83 | HILLSTROM Nathan | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 84 | HEWITT Frank F. | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 85 | FERRIERE Thomas | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 85 | YI David | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 87 | PAINTER Noah | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 88 | WHITE Chance | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.