Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
2 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 19% |
3 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 12% | |
3 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | |
5 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% |
6 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | |
7 | KIM Byung | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
8 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% | |
9 | IARIKOV Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
10 | SHCHUR Landon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | |
11 | LEE Seungwon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
12 | CHOI Mason | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
13 | WANG zhixing (Daniel) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
14 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% | |
15 | IVKOV Dmitriy | 100% | 98% | 77% | 33% | 6% | - | |
16 | THAKUR Om S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | |
17 | CAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 6% | |
18 | FANG Hanning | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | < 1% | |
19 | GONG Haixiang | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 7% | - |
20 | BEZRODNOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
21 | ARKHIPOV Peter | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
22 | CAO Brad | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 14% | 1% | |
23 | LIN Andrew | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
24 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
25 | KATS Dylan G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
26 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 8% | |
27 | WEI Jonny | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
28 | BHATIA Arav | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
29 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% | |
30 | SKORUPAN Grant | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
31 | DURKIN Tristan E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
32 | HU Anton | 100% | 78% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
33 | PARK Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 5% |
34 | ZHANG Braydon | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
35 | IVKOV Alexander | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - | |
36 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
37 | ARICO Trey | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
38 | LI Zachary | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
39 | KIM Brandon | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
39 | GAO Max | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
41 | WU Colin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
42 | BRODSKY Julian | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
43 | CHAI Ethan | 100% | 92% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | |
44 | WALCH Logan | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
45 | WANG Clayton | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
46 | TOM Skyler | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
47 | NASR William | 100% | 91% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | |
48 | ARAVIND Athreya | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
49 | ZHAO corey | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | |
50 | ARIZA Abraham J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 22% | |
50 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
52 | PAN Tristan | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - | |
52 | SINGH Aryaman | 100% | 94% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | |
54 | GUO ZIXU | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
55 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 100% | 95% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
56 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
57 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 72% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
58 | JIANG Matthew | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | |
59 | DROST Lucas | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
60 | DAN Rex | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
61 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | - | - | - |
62 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
63 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | |
64 | BLUMBERG William | 100% | 63% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.