Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | ZAFFT Maximo S. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
2 | JEON Alexander E. | V D D V V V | V V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
3 | SILVER Cameron | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
3 | WU Joseph | V D V V V D | V V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
5 | YU Colin | V V V D D V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
6 | ADLER Ian B. | D V V D V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
7 | MOON Ryan Y. | V D V D V V | V V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
8 | SODERBERG Alex Z. | V V V D D V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
9 | CANDELA Nicholas | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
10 | ARLINGTON Nicholas J. | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
11 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
12 | MUNLIN Donovan | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
13 | JEONG Connor | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
14 | CHONG christopher | V V V D V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
15 | SOOMRO Adam A. | V D V D V D | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
16 | KUMAR Anitya | V D V V D D | V V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
17 | KUDRIAVTCEV Sergei | V V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 6 | +3.1 |
18 | ROBINSON Riley | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
19 | DELANEY Alexander D. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
20 | JEYOON Ryan S. | V V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 6 | +3.1 |
21 | ROY Joseph T. | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
22 | LI Brian X | V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
23 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | V V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
24 | JIN Alexander | V D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
25 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
26 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | D V V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
27 | ALFAIATE Lucas | V V D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
28 | LIU John | V V D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
29 | GOHEL Dayus T. | D V V V V D | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
30 | LUKANYUK Lorence | V V D V D D | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
31 | SMITH Nicholas S. | D D V D V | V V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
32 | KIM Ethan J. | V D V D D D | V V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
33 | RHYU Kozmo | V V V V V V | D | 3.3 | 6 | +2.7 |
34 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | V V V V V V | D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
35 | INSLER Ethan C. | V V V V V V | D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
36 | SUVOROV Yuly | V V V V D V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
37 | LIEF Isaac R. | V D V V V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
38 | CAI Brian | V V V D V D | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
39 | JOSEPH William | V D D V V V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
40 | KROPP Jack | D V V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
41 | SCHULTZ Alex | V V V V D D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
42 | KIM William M. | V V V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
42 | MA Victor | D V V V D V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
42 | JIN Owen | V V D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
45 | HOLDERNESS Landon | V D V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
46 | MARCHANT Albert J. | D V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
47 | CAI Kevin P. | V D V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
48 | KARAUSKY Joshua C. | V V D D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
49 | LEE Daniel Y. | V V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
50 | KILUK Andrew | D V V D V D | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
51 | CUMMINGS Kai | V D V D V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
52 | NIXON Christian A. | D V V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
53 | HODGE Jaydon L. | D V V D D V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
54 | SILVERS Noah E. | V D V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
55 | LEE Seungwon | D V D V V D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
56 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | V D V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
57 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | D D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
58 | NOWAK Jakub P. | D D D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
59 | DOELEMAN zeno | V V D D D D | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
60 | JAIN Sarthak | D D D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
61 | KUCZAJDA Matthew | D D D V V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
62 | DAVIS Scott | V D D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
63 | JIN daniel | D D D D V V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
64 | WICKBOLDT Eric | D V D D V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
65 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | D V V V V D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
66 | O'HARA Keegan J. | D D V V V V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
67 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | V V V D D V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
68 | YULE Alexander L. | D V V D V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
69 | BORATIN Daniel I. | D V V V D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
70 | LAWLER Aidan | D V V V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
71 | STEVENS Daniel | V D D V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
72 | YUROVCHAK Andrew T. | V D V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
73 | KOKENGE Clark | V V D D D V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
74 | BEACH John | D V V V D D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
75 | MELCHER Jack H. | D V D D V V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
76 | CONKLIN Jim | D V V D D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
77 | SMITH Justin C. | V V V D D D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
78 | WU Jason | V V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
79 | PERKINS-OLLILA Justin W. | V D D V V D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
80 | LEHR William D. | D D D V V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
81 | MACARTY Jordan T. | D V D V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
82 | LEONE III Charles D. | D D D V V V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
83 | CLARK Ethan J. | V D V D D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
84 | LIANG Aaron | V D D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
85 | ZHAO corey | D V V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
86 | MADSEN Jr Eric W. | D V V D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
87 | ELLINGTON Keegan A. | V D D V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
88 | GAINES Aaron | D V D D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
89 | KIM Sterling S. | D D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
90 | MCDERMOTT Brian | D D D D V V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
91 | LEE Timothy S. | V D D V D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
92 | GAO Daniel | V D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
93 | GREEN Ummi | D D D D V V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
94 | TARBUSKOVICH III John | V V D D D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
95 | DUDLEY Logan M. | D D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
95 | BARREIRO Darren | D D D D V V | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
97 | LOGUE Ethan D. | D D V D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
98 | MOTIR Lucas D. | D V D D V D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
98 | KIM Dylan J. | D D V V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
100 | ROBERTS Samuel E. | D D D V D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
101 | CUMMINGS Atticus C. | V D D V D D | 4.5 | 2 | -2.5 | |
102 | JAYENDRA Chandrashekar | D V D D V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 | |
103 | TIRRELL Justin J. | D D D V V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 | |
104 | WEAVER Neil | D D D V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 | |
105 | MAGDA Daniel | D D V D D D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 | |
106 | PAHLAVI Kamran | D D D V D D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
107 | KOKENGE Reid | D V D D D D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 | |
108 | COMER Daniel T. | D D V D D D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 | |
109 | COHEN Jared E. | D V D D D D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 | |
109 | PARK Brian | D V D D D D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 | |
109 | MISHIMA Torata | V D D D D D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 | |
109 | ZHAO Luhan | D D D V D D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 | |
113 | PERSAUD Daivik | D D D D V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
114 | KIM Byung | D D D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
115 | GREGORY Abram | D D D D D D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 | |
116 | TREBON Hayden | D D D D D D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 | |
117 | WEISE Eli S. | D D D D D D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 | |
117 | CHAWLA Armaan | D D D D D D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 | |
119 | NOP Will H. | D D D D D D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 | |
120 | BLAKE Randall K. | D D D D D D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 | |
121 | HE Lawrence | D D D D D D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 | |
122 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | D D D D D D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 | |
122 | WELDON Benjamin | D D D D D D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 | |
124 | KAJI Ty | D D D D D D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.