RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | D V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
2 | RONA Milan | V V V V V | V V V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
3 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
3 | SMITH Justin C. | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
5 | THEIN-SANDLER Adrien (Adi) M. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
6 | IVE Isaac L. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
7 | CHIEN Brandon | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
8 | SHUR Yakov C. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
9 | SODERBERG Alex Z. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
10 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
11 | CAI Brian | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
12 | SINGHA Orion | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
13 | WONG Daniel | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
14 | GAINES Aaron | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
15 | MOSES Alexander | D V D V V D | V V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
16 | HIGGINS Branford | D V V V D D | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
17 | WANG Devon | V V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
18 | KIM Benjamin I. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
19 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | V D V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
20 | GRAYSON Shane W. | V V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
21 | PERKINS-OLLILA Justin W. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
22 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | D V V V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
23 | ARIETA Ryan T. | V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
24 | PARK Elliot | D D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
25 | TSANG Lok Hin Gary | V D D V V V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
26 | DATTA Paul M. | D V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
27 | AHN Gus | D V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
28 | COOPER Rowan | D V V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
29 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | V D V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
30 | LO Jake | D V D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
31 | WEAVER Neil | D V D V V D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
32 | CHU Allan | V D V D D | V V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
33 | SHARMA Sanil | V V V D V V | D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
34 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | V D V V D V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
35 | THORNE Casey B. | V V D D V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
36 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | D V V V V D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
37 | WANG Nathan | V V D V D V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
38 | GULLO Kenji Y. | V D V V D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
39 | YAO Geoffrey B. | V V D D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
40 | ZHENG Haoran | D V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
41 | PHUKAN Rohin | V D D V D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
42 | WELDON Benjamin | V D V D V D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
43 | GREEN Ummi | V V D D V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
44 | LOGUE Ethan D. | D V V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
45 | KILUK Andrew | D V D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
46 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | V D D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
47 | ULINICH Alexander | D V V V D D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
48 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | D V D V V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
49 | LEE Chun Po | V V V D D D | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
50 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | V V D D V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
51 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | D D D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
52 | USHER Alexander | V D D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
53 | JIN daniel | D D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
54 | CHIEN Zachary M. | D D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
55 | PHEN Justin P. | V D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
56 | MUNOZ Humberto | V D D D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
57 | MATTIS George | D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
58 | BAILEY Creston P. | D V D V D D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
59 | WESTON Tom | D D V D D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
60 | KURITZ Marc M. | D D V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
61 | KOPPE Alexander | D D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
62 | MA Victor | V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
63 | YUEN Nathan | D D V D D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
64 | CROSSMAN Brandon | V D D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
65 | LEE Joseph J. | V D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
66 | LIU Andrew | D D V V D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
67 | GREEN Jabreel | D V V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
68 | WANG Owen | D V D D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
69 | LIPTON Michael D. | D V D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
70 | BURLING Trenor | V D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
71 | ALEXANDER Chuck | D D D V D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
72 | KIM Sullivan | V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
73 | WATT Darren | D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
74 | WILLIS Alan | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
75 | WIEGAND-SHAHANI Braden M. | D D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
76 | SHA Michael | D D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
77 | CARTER Austin L. | D D D D V D | D | 3.8 | 1 | -2.8 |
78 | KNUDSEN Travis | D D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
79 | MIAO Kunqi | V D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
80 | BAGCHI Aritra | D D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
81 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
82 | DU Shunyu K. | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
83 | GAO Chaney C. | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
84 | LEE Richard U. | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
85 | FU Leon | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
86 | LIU Yikun | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
87 | ZHANG Nathan | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.