Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YOUNG Peyton E. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 17% | |
| 2 | ZHANG Alec | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 3 | KIM Benjamin I. | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 3 | WU Joseph | - | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 37% | 20% |
| 5 | MATTIS George | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
| 6 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 44% | 37% |
| 7 | DAO Matthew M. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
| 8 | WONG Daniel | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 3% |
| 9 | EMARA Omar | - | 3% | 31% | 43% | 20% | 3% | |
| 10 | JIN Alexander | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 35% |
| 11 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 12 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 13 | WEAVER Neil | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 14 | HIGGINS Branford | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% | |
| 15 | USHER Alexander | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 16 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 6% |
| 17 | JIN Nicholas | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 18 | SMITH Jackson | - | - | 5% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
| 19 | ZHU Max | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 20 | MCDONALD Ethan | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 21 | ZHENG Haoran | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 22 | MOHEBI Saam | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
| 23 | PHUKAN Rohin | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | - |
| 24 | GRAYSON Shane W. | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 14% | |
| 25 | AHN Gus | - | 1% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 9% | |
| 26 | HARR Carver | 4% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | JIN daniel | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
| 28 | MA Victor | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% |
| 29 | MENDOZA Zachari | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
| 30 | CHU Allan | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | MOSES Alexander | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
| 32 | KOPPE Alexander | 1% | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 33 | GAO Daniel | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 34 | WESTON Tom | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 35 | SINGHA Orion | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% |
| 36 | HWANG Samuel W. | - | 1% | 14% | 40% | 36% | 10% | |
| 37 | ULINICH Alexander | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 38 | KIM Darius H. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 38 | PARK Elliot | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 40 | WANG DEVON | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 41 | WANG owen | 1% | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 42 | LI Sui Lun (Phillip) | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 43 | LIN Kyran | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 45% | 19% |
| 44 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 45 | HE Lawrence | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% |
| 46 | WANG Nathan | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
| 47 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 48 | LEE Joseph J. | 5% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 49 | LIM Matthew T. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | SOOHOO Jackson F. | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 51 | JAIN Sarthak | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 52 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 53 | ZHUANG William | 22% | 39% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | DUONG Enoch | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 55 | GREEN Jabreel | 1% | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 55 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 57 | KNUDSEN Travis | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 58 | YOUNG Jr Colby | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 59 | PRAKASH Hari | 9% | 43% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | FERRIERE Joshua | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 61 | LEE Chun Po | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 62 | SHA Michael | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | KIRK Marcus Haagen | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 64 | LIANG Aaron | < 1% | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 65 | WATT Darren | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | DAO Alexander | 9% | 45% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 67 | BAGCHI Aritra | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 68 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 69 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 38% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 70 | COMER Alexander J. | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 71 | GAO Chaney C. | 14% | 42% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 72 | WONG Nathan | 1% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
| 73 | MILSTEIN Nikolas | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 74 | BURLING Trenor | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 75 | KIM Sullivan | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 76 | GU Aidan | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 77 | ZHANG Nathan | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 78 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 79 | PAK Elliot | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 80 | JU Hanul | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 80 | AYABINA JR John | 10% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 82 | RAMOS Jaydon | 7% | 31% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 83 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 84 | FU Leon | 10% | 74% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 85 | ZHANG Andrew | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 86 | MIAO KUNQI | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 87 | LIU Yikun | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.