Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YOUNG Peyton E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 17% | |
| 2 | ZHANG Alec | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 3 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 9% |
| 3 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 20% |
| 5 | MATTIS George | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 10% |
| 6 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 37% |
| 7 | DAO Matthew M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% |
| 8 | WONG Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 3% |
| 9 | EMARA Omar | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | 23% | 3% | |
| 10 | JIN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% |
| 11 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 12 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% |
| 13 | WEAVER Neil | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
| 14 | HIGGINS Branford | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 7% | |
| 15 | USHER Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 16 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 17 | JIN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% |
| 18 | SMITH Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% | |
| 19 | ZHU Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 20 | MCDONALD Ethan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 21 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 22 | MOHEBI Saam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
| 23 | PHUKAN Rohin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | - |
| 24 | GRAYSON Shane W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 14% | |
| 25 | AHN Gus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 44% | 9% | |
| 26 | HARR Carver | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | JIN daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 28 | MA Victor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
| 29 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 30 | CHU Allan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | |
| 32 | KOPPE Alexander | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 33 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 34 | WESTON Tom | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 35 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% |
| 36 | HWANG Samuel W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 10% | |
| 37 | ULINICH Alexander | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 38 | KIM Darius H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 38 | PARK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 40 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 41 | WANG owen | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 42 | LI Sui Lun (Phillip) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 43 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 19% |
| 44 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 45 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
| 46 | WANG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% | |
| 47 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 48 | LEE Joseph J. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 49 | LIM Matthew T. | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | SOOHOO Jackson F. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 51 | JAIN Sarthak | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 52 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 53 | ZHUANG William | 100% | 78% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | DUONG Enoch | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 55 | GREEN Jabreel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 55 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 57 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 58 | YOUNG Jr Colby | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 59 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 91% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | FERRIERE Joshua | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 61 | LEE Chun Po | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 62 | SHA Michael | 100% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 63 | KIRK Marcus Haagen | 100% | 93% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 64 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
| 65 | WATT Darren | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 66 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 91% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 67 | BAGCHI Aritra | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 68 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 69 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 100% | 62% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 70 | COMER Alexander J. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 71 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 86% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 72 | WONG Nathan | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 14% | 2% | |
| 73 | MILSTEIN Nikolas | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 74 | BURLING Trenor | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 75 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 76 | GU Aidan | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 77 | ZHANG Nathan | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 78 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 79 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 80 | JU Hanul | 100% | 82% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 80 | AYABINA JR John | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 82 | RAMOS Jaydon | 100% | 93% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 83 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 84 | FU Leon | 100% | 90% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 85 | ZHANG Andrew | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 86 | MIAO KUNQI | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 87 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.