King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | YUROVCHAK Andrew T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 37% | |
| 2 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | |
| 3 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 3 | TUCKER Owen J. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 4% |
| 5 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 22% | |
| 6 | JIN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% |
| 7 | KUMAR Anitya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
| 8 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 9 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
| 10 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 13% | |
| 11 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | 100% | 98% | 79% | 38% | 7% | |
| 12 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | 100% | 99% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | FELDMAN Jaemin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
| 13 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% |
| 16 | JIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
| 17 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 18 | MORSE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
| 19 | AGAON Ethan | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | PARK Brian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 7% |
| 21 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 22 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 23 | DOLMETSCH Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% |
| 24 | SHEN Max | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 25 | SIMPSON Patrick | 100% | 95% | 69% | 28% | 4% | |
| 26 | SHIV Rishi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% |
| 27 | KIM Byung | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 28 | SJOSTEDT Jacob H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | |
| 29 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% | |
| 30 | SINGH Aryaman | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 31 | LI Jalen | 100% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | MARRAN Erik R. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 33% | 5% | |
| 33 | SITBON-TAYLOR Noe B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 34 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 35 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 93% | 60% | 19% | 2% | |
| 36 | LEHR William D. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 10% | |
| 37 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 38 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 39 | DIXON Thomas | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 40 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 41 | AGAON Shawn | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 42 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 43 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 100% | 77% | 29% | 4% | - | |
| 44 | CHOI Mason | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 6% | |
| 45 | POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
| 46 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% |
| 47 | CHEN Eric | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% |
| 48 | MAGDA Daniel | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 49 | ZHAO corey | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 50 | STALL-RYAN Jonathan | 100% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | DISIMONE David Z. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% |
| 51 | CHOE Andrew | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 53 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 91% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 54 | PRIHODKO Max | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 6% | |
| 55 | ZHAO Luhan | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
| 56 | MARTINEZ Joshua | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 57 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 58 | BINDAS Odinn A. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 59 | WHITEHURST JJ | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 59 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 61 | LEE Seungwon | 100% | 96% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 62 | MCCRACKEN Dylan | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 63 | LAI Coby | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 64 | ZHANG William | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 66 | GONG Haixiang | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 67 | MAHESH Tarun | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 68 | FENG du | 100% | 10% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.