Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HADDAD Justin R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% |
2 | SERAJIAN Abdollah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% | |
3 | MARCHANT Albert J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
3 | WU Joseph | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
5 | SHAH S Ayush | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% |
6 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 84% | 56% | 24% | 5% |
7 | O'HARA Keegan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
8 | GARCIA-ROGERS Lucas H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
9 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
10 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
11 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
12 | KOKENGE Clark | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% |
13 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
14 | ADLER Ian B. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 4% | |
15 | LEE Shwan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | |
16 | BLAKE Randall K. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
17 | JIN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
18 | ZHAO Luhan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 17% | 4% | - |
19 | LIU John | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 2% | |
20 | KIM Byung | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
21 | JAYENDRA Chandrashekar | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
22 | BENACK Steven M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
23 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
24 | KUCZAJDA Matthew | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
25 | STEVENS Daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
26 | ALFAIATE Lucas | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | |
27 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
28 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 18% |
29 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% | |
30 | WU Jason | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
31 | SIMPSON Patrick | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
32 | LEHR William D. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
33 | STUSNICK Hunter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
34 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
35 | WANG Tristan | 100% | 93% | 69% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - |
36 | WU Byron | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
37 | COHEN Jared E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
38 | SHAH Maximilian A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
38 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
40 | LUKANYUK Lorence | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
41 | HERMANSON David B. | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
42 | ROBERTS Samuel E. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | |
43 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 19% | 2% | |
44 | JIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 9% |
45 | DISIMONE David Z. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
45 | SKAALAND Will | 100% | 91% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
47 | NIXON Christian A. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | |
48 | JUN Jaywu | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
49 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
50 | TIRRELL Justin J. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 44% | 16% | 2% |
50 | STOTT Donovan R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 59% | 26% | 5% |
52 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
53 | GREGORY Abram | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
53 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
55 | WISCHNIA Jacob I. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
56 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
57 | BASOK Nikita | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 20% | 4% | - |
58 | PARK Vincent | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
59 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - |
60 | SVIBEN Cameron | 100% | 92% | 59% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
61 | JOSEPH William | 100% | 97% | 81% | 52% | 22% | 5% | 1% |
62 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
63 | PARK Brian | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
64 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 86% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
65 | CLARK Ethan J. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 14% | 1% | |
66 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
67 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
68 | GAMBINO Robert A. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
69 | MAGDA Daniel | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
70 | MILLER Kurt | 100% | 42% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
71 | DIVERIS Joseph | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
72 | CHOE Andrew | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
73 | JENNINGS Adin | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
74 | WANG Eric S | 100% | 76% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.