Fredericksburg Expo & Conference Center - Hall A & B - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 44% | |
2 | MAZUR Daniil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% |
3 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
3 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
5 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 16% |
6 | CHEN Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 29% | |
7 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
8 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 39% | |
9 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% | |
10 | NORTH Alexander M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 8% |
11 | XIAO Leon (Ruibo) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
12 | CHONG Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% |
13 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 25% | |
14 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
15 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
16 | MANZ Hamilton R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
17 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
18 | CHAMBLISS Logan C. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
19 | JORDAN Anton | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
20 | LEE Shwan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | |
21 | CLICK Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
22 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
23 | KIM Donghyeok | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 13% |
24 | WANG Tristan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% |
25 | KWOUN Miles S. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 43% | 9% | 1% | |
26 | KIM Dylan J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
27 | WANG Trontour | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
28 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
29 | BOUMEDIENNE Sami | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 20% | 2% |
30 | LI Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
31 | WANG Clayton | 100% | 98% | 79% | 37% | 7% | - | |
32 | ALLEY Everett T | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
33 | HEADRICK Lance | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 5% | - | |
34 | CHEMEZOV Trent | 100% | 54% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
35 | ROTHKA Spencer J. | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
36 | SINGH Aryaman | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 5% | - | |
37 | KIM Taeho | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
38 | ZHANG Caden | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
39 | STEPHENS Corbin | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
40 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
41 | CAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
42 | MAHESH Tarun | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
43 | LAM Bill | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
44 | RUSSELL Tallis | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
45 | BANNEN Nicholas | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
46 | BERNARD Jack B. | 100% | 69% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
47 | GLENNON Sebastian J. | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 3% | - | |
47 | LIN Harrison | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
49 | FU Ethan | 100% | 95% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | |
50 | AMOLSCH Dylan | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | |
51 | LEONE III Charles D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
52 | MEGGERS Davin | 100% | 68% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
53 | KANG EUNWOO | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
54 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
55 | SELLAR Ian | 100% | 68% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
55 | SO Lorenzo | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
57 | CAO Brad | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 1% | |
58 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
59 | TIRADO Giancarlo | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.