Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | IVE Isaac L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% |
| 2 | RONG Yao (Derek) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 45% |
| 3 | BOYCE Samuel H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
| 3 | RONA Milan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% |
| 5 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
| 6 | MARKOTA Vedran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 7 | KANG Philip F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 8 | HESSLEGRAVE Porter B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 19% |
| 9 | ZHANG Alec | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 10 | LO Jake | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | < 1% | - |
| 11 | JIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 12 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 23% |
| 13 | ZHANG Nathan | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 14 | DIECK Logan O. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 15 | KIM Donghyeok | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 16 | LOGUE Ethan D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 17 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 18 | HIGGINS Branford | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 19 | WONG Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 20 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% |
| 21 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 22 | WATT Darren | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 23 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 24 | MA Victor | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 25 | SPROWLES Cameron D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% |
| 26 | HE Zhiheng | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 27 | UVAROV Andrii | 100% | 99% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 28 | PARK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 29 | WILSON Brent A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 52% | 14% |
| 30 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | SMITH Justin C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 32 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | WRIGHT Christopher | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 34 | SARKAR Agniv | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 35 | KOPPE Alexander | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | < 1% | - |
| 36 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | 6% | - |
| 37 | NIXON Mark | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
| 38 | WESTON Tom | 100% | 98% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 38 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 40 | GRABER Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% |
| 41 | DEMPSEY Connor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 7% |
| 42 | POLAKOSKI David R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
| 43 | LIU Noah | 100% | 80% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | FRENCH Timothy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
| 45 | ULINICH Alexander | 100% | 99% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 46 | SHARMA Sanil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 16% |
| 47 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 48 | MUNOZ Humberto | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 49 | FU Leon | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 50 | CHU Allan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 51 | BAILEY Creston P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 20% | 3% |
| 51 | MING Nathan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 53 | WANG Devon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 54 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
| 55 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 56 | PARKER Lane S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 57 | GAINES Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 21% | 2% |
| 58 | HUSSAIN Kamran | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 59 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 60 | ZHUANG William | 100% | 91% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | YUEN Nathan | 100% | 56% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 62 | LIU Felix | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 62 | LEE Bryson | 100% | 74% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | ALEXANDER Chuck | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 65 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 66 | MENDOZA Zandro | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 68 | LOFTUS Luca | 100% | 80% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | PERKINS-OLLILA Justin W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 70 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 71 | PHEN Justin P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 18% |
| 72 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 73 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 74 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 75 | HILLSTROM Nathan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 76 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 77 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 78 | ALI Adam | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | LEE Richard U. | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | JU Hanul | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 81 | HEWITT Frank F. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 82 | KURITZ Marc M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 83 | MIAO Kunqi | 100% | 72% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 84 | LEE Chun Po | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 85 | NALBANDIAN Vahan P. | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 86 | KIM Taeho | 100% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 87 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 88 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 89 | SETTE Alessandro | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 90 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 91 | MARSH Timothy G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% | 2% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.