Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | |
| 2 | LEE Seungwon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
| 3 | HABIB Farooq | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 21% |
| 3 | BOUMEDIENNE Sami | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 24% |
| 5 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 6 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 3% |
| 7 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 8 | JAKLITSCH Michael (Mike) T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
| 9 | JIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
| 10 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 11 | WELDON Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 10% |
| 12 | LI Patrick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
| 13 | JONES Caleb | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 14 | RAJ Shrey | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 15 | COHEN Benjamin A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 16 | FU Leon | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 17 | STRAUSS Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% |
| 18 | ALLEN Graham | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
| 19 | WATT Darren | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 20 | CHIEN Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% |
| 21 | PARK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 41% | 7% |
| 22 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 23 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | MA Victor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 25 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 28 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% | 5% | |
| 29 | PERKA Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 30 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 32 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 33 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 34 | CASTELLY Luke | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 35 | ZHANG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 36 | BENACK Steven M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 37 | ZACHES Torrey | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 38 | PAN Tristan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 39 | SIRBU Dan | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 40 | ZHANG Alec | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
| 41 | RYAN Seth C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 42 | DENNIS Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 43 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 44 | MADSEN Jr Eric W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 7% |
| 45 | CHU Allan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 46 | EVERS Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 47 | TORRES Nicolas | 100% | 99% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 48 | LEE Chun Po | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 49 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 50 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 51 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 5% |
| 52 | ALI Adam | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 53 | WANG owen | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 54 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% | 2% | |
| 55 | BARNETT Devin | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 56 | LO Jake | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 57 | LOFTUS Luca | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | CHIEN Zachary M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 59 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 60 | KUO Rylan | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 61 | RYAN Christopher | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 62 | MING Nathan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 63 | NALBANDIAN VAHAN P. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 64 | HE Zhiheng | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 65 | MCADOO Declan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 66 | CLAES Lucas | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 67 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 68 | ELZAYN Hadi S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 3% |
| 69 | LIU Noah | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 69 | OU wei | 100% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | MIAO KUNQI | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | GENCHEV Madav | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | LEE JiYuen | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | MARTIN Charles | 100% | 76% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | CHOI Kaiden I. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 76 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 77 | MENDOZA Zandro | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 78 | KONG Martin C. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 79 | BUERGISSER Kai | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | BURLING Trenor | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 81 | FANG Hanning | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 82 | BEAVER Aaron | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 83 | JU Hanul | 100% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | CAMPBELL Kenneth | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 84 | LIPTON Michael D. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 84 | RAHMAN Yousef | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 87 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 88 | TETALI Vishwanath | 100% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 89 | LI zerong | 100% | 63% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | CHANG Kristopher | 100% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.