America's Center Convention Complex - St. Louis, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ITKIN Nick (Nikita) B. | - | - | - | - | - | 8% | 91% |
| 2 | OLIVARES Marcello G. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% |
| 3 | BOURTIS James S. | - | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 3 | EMMER Chase T. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 40% | |
| 5 | LI Brandon H. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 51% |
| 6 | KUMBLA Sidarth | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 76% |
| 7 | LOUIE Bryce | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
| 8 | UM Ethan A. | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% | |
| 9 | CHEN Allen | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 10 | CHEN Andrew | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 12% |
| 11 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 12 | ONIK Elijah T. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 13 | KIM Nicholas W. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 14 | ZHANG Daniel D. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 25% | |
| 15 | KELLY William J. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 36% | 17% |
| 16 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
| 17 | LI Owen | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | |
| 18 | NDIAYE Edriss G. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 29% | |
| 19 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 2% |
| 20 | KUMBLA Samarth | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
| 21 | LI Richard | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 22 | SNYTSHEUVEL John Evan (Evan) | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 23 | MARTINEZ Donavyn E. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | MITBERG Gregory W. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% | |
| 24 | GASSNER Ethan I. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% | |
| 26 | VOGLER Justin K. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 27 | XIAO Ethan J. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
| 28 | LEWIS Paul D. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | PRILUTSKY David B. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 37% | 19% |
| 30 | SISINNI Riccardo | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | KASI Sanjay | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% | ||
| 32 | CULLIVAN Justice | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 33 | WU Alexander | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | ||
| 35 | CHEN James P. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 36 | SINGH Dayaal | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 37 | BANERJEE ANUP | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% | - |
| 38 | YANG Luao | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
| 39 | KAO Castor T. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% | ||
| 40 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% | 1% |
| 41 | DESHMUKH Arjun | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 42 | ZHANG Andy W. | - | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 43 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 44 | HUTH Mitchell | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 45 | LO Conrad | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% |
| 46 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 47 | STANLEY Mason B. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 16% | 1% |
| 48 | BRUK Peter J. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 49 | OURSLER Jack | - | 5% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 50 | HUANG Dongrong | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 51 | TANG Owen S. | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 53 | SHA Yi Peng | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 54 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 55 | YU Vinni | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 56 | BINDER Zachary (Zach) B. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | |
| 57 | BAE Kevin | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 5% | |
| 58 | JAIN Aditya | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 59 | DESANDO Michael R. | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 60 | SHAFAIE Kaveh | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | |
| 61 | GODZHIK Zachary | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 62 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 63 | DIERKS Kian | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 64 | XIAO EDWARD | 21% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | ||
| 65 | LEE Chris | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - | |
| 66 | LUH Ethan K. | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 67 | WANG Brian S. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
| 68 | LEWIS Akhil | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 69 | BAS Liam | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 70 | KIM Yonjae | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 71 | SHIN Philip D. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
| 72 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 73 | KATAYAMA Kevin | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 74 | XIAO Enoch A. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
| 75 | ROSOWSKY Ahmed | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 76 | SIU Aiden | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 77 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 78 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 79 | DINSAY Kristjan | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | ROSE Ben | 18% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 81 | BADLANI Dev | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 82 | KNIZHNIK David | 5% | 24% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 83 | SONG Aiden S. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 84 | JEON Caleb A. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 85 | KIM Brandon J. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
| 86 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 87 | GOOR Julian | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 88 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 89 | KIM Ryan Y. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 90 | LEE Aidan | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 91 | LI Raphael C. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 92 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 93 | GRIFFIN John O. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 94 | LEE Jacob J | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 95 | GRIFFITH JACK | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 2% |
| 96 | REYES Omar | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 97 | KIM Jackson | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 98 | DAI Jonathan T. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 99 | OH SEAN | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 99 | CHENG Jonathan | 28% | 45% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 101 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
| 101 | ZHENG Alan H. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 103 | ADLER David R. | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 9% | - |
| 104 | KEE Andrew L. | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 105 | NUNNINK Phillip W. | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 106 | LI Eric | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 107 | AHN Jun | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 108 | JIANG Owen | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 109 | GONG Benjamin | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 110 | DORAN Wesley C. | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 111 | BING Charles | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 112 | HUTH Jacob | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 112 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 18% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 112 | WYMAN Julian | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 115 | DETERING Julian | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 116 | JANG Jaewon | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 117 | LI Matthew | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 118 | LIN James G. | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 119 | PO Oliver | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 119 | PAN Henry | 30% | 47% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 121 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 122 | MA Andrew | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 123 | JI Aidan Y. | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 124 | JOSEPH Willem | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 125 | SONG Noel | 32% | 47% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 126 | SONG Leonardo T. | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% | ||
| 127 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 128 | LIN Michael | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 129 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 27% | 45% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 129 | MATSAKH Philip | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 131 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 132 | MIALL Steven A. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.