Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
2 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | |
3 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
3 | HIGGINS Branford | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% | |
5 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
6 | STRAUSS Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% |
7 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | |
8 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
9 | LO Jake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
10 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
11 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
12 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
13 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% | |
14 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
15 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
16 | FU Leon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 27% |
17 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% |
18 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 41% |
19 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
20 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
21 | PAN Tristan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
22 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
23 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
24 | OBERDERFER Vladimir | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
25 | YU Austin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
26 | TIEN Jabin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
27 | LIU Noah | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
28 | PHAM Sawyer T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
29 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
30 | LI Ethan R. | 100% | 94% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | |
31 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 5% |
32 | FERRIERE Joshua | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
33 | YUEN Nathan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | < 1% |
34 | WANG zhixing (Daniel) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% | |
35 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 14% |
36 | CHOI Kaiden I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
37 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 7% |
37 | CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
39 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
40 | CHOI Zachary | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
41 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
42 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 19% |
43 | SCHROEDER Dylan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 25% | 3% |
44 | MCADOO Declan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 21% | 2% |
45 | ZHU Eric | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
46 | MULCAHY Olaf | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
47 | LEE Damien | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
48 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
49 | RICHARD silas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
50 | ZHUANG William | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
51 | AVETISIAN Alexander | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
52 | FANG Hanning | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
53 | DONAHUE Lake | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
54 | LEE Bryson | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - | |
55 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
56 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
57 | MING Nathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
58 | JU Hanul | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
58 | YAO Derek (Shunyu) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 2% |
60 | WONG Ethan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
61 | WONG Preston | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
62 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
63 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
64 | HIGGINS Calvin | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
65 | LEWIS Parker | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 14% |
66 | KIM Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
67 | MIAO KUNQI | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 20% | 2% |
68 | LAI Alexander | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
69 | BUERGISSER Kai | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
70 | WU Steven | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
71 | SIM Ian | 100% | 85% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
72 | THOMAS Michael | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
73 | LIU Yueri | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
74 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | 100% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
75 | LI Yunji (Rain) | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
76 | TONG Samuel | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
77 | COLIS Alexandre | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
78 | AGGELER Donovan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
79 | KIM Ian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
80 | CHENG Trevor | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
81 | POSSON Luke | 100% | 94% | 66% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
82 | GENCHEV Madav | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
83 | GU Aidan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
84 | LEE Jake (JiYuen) | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
85 | LI zerong | 100% | 86% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
86 | MILEY Walker | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
86 | CHRISTODOULIDES Martinos | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
88 | SHEN Jiayi | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
89 | DACHELET Sawyer | 100% | 87% | 46% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
89 | ITO WILSON Miles | 100% | 71% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
91 | BALDWIN Alexander | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
92 | ZHAO Colin | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
93 | RAMOS Max | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
94 | GUO Woody | 100% | 70% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
95 | LIN Jason | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.