Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Daniel Y. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
| 2 | KROPP Jack | - | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
| 3 | PARK Ian C. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 3 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 5 | KIM Edward J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 6 | LIU John | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% |
| 7 | YAVOROVSKIY JOSHUA I. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 8 | RHYU Kozmo | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 9 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | < 1% |
| 10 | WIMMER Chandler M. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 47% |
| 11 | KING Cameron | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 12 | RINEHART Conner M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 21% |
| 13 | WU Byron | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 14 | CLICK Aiden | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 44% | 23% |
| 15 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 16 | LEE Shwan | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 17 | CHAWLA Armaan | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 18 | CHONG christopher | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 19 | CHEN Eric | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | YI Jason | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 21 | ZENG Zihan | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 22 | JEYOON Ryan S. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 22 | NORTH Alexander M. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 24 | PARK Vincent | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | ZHANG Andrew | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
| 26 | LI Benjamin | 1% | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 27 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 28 | SALISBURY Cary | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 29 | MUMMIDI Rishi | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 30 | GEHRKE Nate | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | LU Sebastian X. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 32 | STEVENS Daniel | - | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 33 | LIOZNYANSKY Simon | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 34 | BLUM Oliver | 9% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | MUN Chur-Yong | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 36 | ILYAS Zakariya | - | 4% | 30% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 37 | FU Ethan | 26% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | CHAI Jonathan | - | 1% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 39 | KHANNA Nikhil | - | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 40 | KANACH Duncan | 2% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 41 | LEE Seungwon | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 42 | HEISE Alexander D. | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 43 | GOLCZEWSKI Benjamin | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | KUMAR Aidan | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 45 | STUBBLEFIELD Evan | 2% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 46 | MARGHUB Safi | 10% | 34% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | CHOU Ryan | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 48 | JANG Elliot | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 49 | CAO Brad | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 50 | CHOI Marcus | 52% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | ZHANG Andy | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | ZHANG Andy | 62% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | ZHANG Caden | 30% | 58% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | REITINGER Luke M. | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | MORAN Joseph | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | BERNACKI IRWIN Joshua | 18% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.