Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% |
| 2 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 5% |
| 3 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
| 3 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 5 | KIM Edward J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 6 | LIU John | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
| 7 | YAVOROVSKIY JOSHUA I. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 8 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 9 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | < 1% |
| 10 | WIMMER Chandler M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 11 | KING Cameron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 12 | RINEHART Conner M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% |
| 13 | WU Byron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 23% | 3% |
| 14 | CLICK Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 23% |
| 15 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 16 | LEE Shwan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 17 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 18 | CHONG christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% |
| 19 | CHEN Eric | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | YI Jason | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 21 | ZENG Zihan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 22 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 22 | NORTH Alexander M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 24 | PARK Vincent | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | ZHANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
| 26 | LI Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 27 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 28 | SALISBURY Cary | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 29 | MUMMIDI Rishi | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | GEHRKE Nate | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | LU Sebastian X. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 32 | STEVENS Daniel | 100% | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 33 | LIOZNYANSKY Simon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
| 34 | BLUM Oliver | 100% | 91% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | MUN Chur-Yong | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 36 | ILYAS Zakariya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 37 | FU Ethan | 100% | 74% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | CHAI Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
| 39 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 40 | KANACH Duncan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 41 | LEE Seungwon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 42 | HEISE Alexander D. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 43 | GOLCZEWSKI Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 45 | STUBBLEFIELD Evan | 100% | 98% | 78% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 46 | MARGHUB Safi | 100% | 90% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | CHOU Ryan | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 48 | JANG Elliot | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 49 | CAO Brad | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 50 | CHOI Marcus | 100% | 48% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | ZHANG Andy | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | ZHANG Andy | 100% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | ZHANG Caden | 100% | 70% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | REITINGER Luke M. | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | MORAN Joseph | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | BERNACKI IRWIN Joshua | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.