Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC/Y8

Y-14 Men's Foil

Saturday, November 30, 2019 at 8:00 AM

Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 KIM Nicholas W. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 61%
2 PELOSKY Zack B. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 62%
3 HOOSHI Dylan M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 93% 59%
3 HOOSHI Jayden C. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 55%
5 ZHANG Nicholas Z. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 69%
6 LI Richard 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 37%
7 BAE Kevin 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 75% 29%
7 ZELTSER Lawrence M. 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 54% 16%
9 BAS Liam 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 81% 33%
9 MARX Oscar L. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 43%
11 ONIK Elijah T. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 35%
12 PAE Jonathan L. 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 59% 18%
13 PAN Eric 100% 100% 100% 98% 82% 39% 5%
14 CHENG Jonathan 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 54%
15 GRAHAM Roy J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 50%
16 SHA Yi Peng 100% 100% 99% 87% 51% 14%
17 FU Samuel Y. 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 75% 33%
18 DOCTOR Aidan L. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 16%
19 COSTELLO Chaissen F. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 43%
20 ANTON Nathaniel 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 64% 17%
21 LIANG Lixi (Henry) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 66%
22 FOGELSON Frederick J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 79% 34%
23 LI Owen 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 32%
24 LEE Joshua 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 29%
25 DAI Jonathan T. 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 29%
26 KEE Andrew L. 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 58% 17%
26 YANG Luao 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 35%
28 MOHAMED Murad 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 43% 8%
29 BRUK Peter J. 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 53% 16%
30 LEE Aidan 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 53% 13%
31 ALIMI Yacine A. 100% 100% 96% 78% 40% 10% 1%
32 GARCIA Sebastian R. 100% 100% 99% 91% 60% 19%
33 NAGER Noah 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 69% 19%
34 ORVANANOS Jorge 100% 100% 96% 82% 51% 18% 3%
34 CHOI Jiwoo J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95%
36 SYOMICHEV Gleb A. 100% 99% 91% 64% 28% 6% 1%
37 ZHANG Yun Isaac 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 80% 28%
38 RUSADZE Nickolas 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 63% 19%
39 BING Charles 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 47%
40 GEOGHEGAN Ronan 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 50% 12%
41 CATINO Brennen 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 42% 7%
42 HORSLEY Alexander 100% 100% 100% 100% 92% 58% 15%
43 MARX Jackson L. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 56% 14%
44 TAHOUN Mostafa 100% 99% 93% 71% 37% 10% 1%
45 LI Eric 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 38% 7%
46 SONG Leonardo T. 100% 100% 99% 85% 47% 11%
47 KAO Castor T. 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 75% 35%
48 VERSTEELE Sander 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 65% 20%
49 DORAN Wesley C. 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 48% 10%
50 QI Steve 100% 99% 91% 61% 22% 4% -
51 AHN Jun 100% 100% 100% 96% 75% 34% 4%
52 GOOR Julian 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 60% 2%
53 LI Yao (Liam) 100% 100% 98% 81% 39% 7% -
54 KWON Ethan 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 36% 7%
55 CULLIVAN Justice 100% 100% 99% 90% 57% 18% 2%
56 ZHANG Zixuan "Mark" 100% 99% 83% 40% 7% - -
57 TORRES Treston 100% 93% 67% 31% 8% 1% -
58 CANO Marcos E. 100% 99% 90% 65% 32% 8% 1%
59 WU Alexander 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 47% 12%
60 HAN Lawrence 100% 99% 93% 73% 40% 12% 1%
61 PALMA Matthew Dominic 100% 99% 87% 56% 22% 4% -
62 ZHAI Jeffrey 100% 100% 100% 93% 60% 17% 1%
63 SHIN Joshua J. 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 35% 6%
64 KNIZHNIK David 100% 98% 85% 48% 10% 1% -
65 TOLBA Abdelrahman 100% 100% 100% 100% 92% 58% 10%
65 HONG Issac 100% 100% 96% 73% 32% 6% -
67 LIU Eric Y. 100% 99% 90% 62% 26% 6% -
67 XU Jia Bao (Bowen) 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 51% 13%
69 GORBACHEV Alexander 100% 100% 100% 98% 82% 40% 5%
70 TSIMIKLIS Yanni 100% 100% 99% 88% 42% 9% 1%
71 MIALL Steven A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 68% 15%
72 WANG Julang 100% 97% 64% 17% 2% - -
73 ZHEN Ethan 100% 100% 99% 92% 62% 22% 2%
73 DRESSEL Jet 100% 97% 76% 36% 8% - -
75 GARR James D. 100% 100% 98% 84% 46% 8% -
76 PAE Brian L. 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 34% 6%
76 TANG Owen S. 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 28% 5%
76 XIANG Derrick 100% 100% 94% 71% 32% 6% -
79 ZHENG zhe 100% 100% 99% 89% 52% 12% 1%
80 PO Oliver 100% 100% 96% 70% 28% 5%
81 GUO Jacob 100% 100% 98% 83% 46% 12% 1%
82 LEE Jacob 100% 96% 74% 34% 8% 1% -
83 LI Matthew 100% 100% 98% 84% 48% 13% 1%
83 XIAO Benjamin 100% 96% 73% 36% 9% 1% -
85 ZHANG Huaxu 100% 80% 41% 11% 1% - -
86 HE Yuhao 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 31% 4%
87 MENG Zhaoyi 100% 99% 92% 68% 33% 8% 1%
88 MOHAMED Amir 100% 100% 93% 71% 35% 9% 1%
89 LIN James G. 100% 99% 92% 70% 37% 10% 1%
90 BOYLE Aiden P. 100% 83% 43% 12% 2% - -
90 LEE Jacob J 100% 100% 98% 85% 50% 13% 1%
92 GONG Benjamin 100% 100% 95% 78% 46% 16% 2%
93 TANG August L. 100% 100% 96% 77% 40% 10% 1%
93 LIN Michael 100% 99% 86% 52% 17% 3% -
95 SHAO Eric 100% 91% 57% 19% 3% - -
96 JIANG Owen 100% 99% 94% 76% 43% 13% 2%
97 MILLER Aidan A. 100% 100% 98% 88% 58% 19% 2%
98 CHEN Kyle P. 100% 100% 100% 97% 78% 26% 3%
99 AUGUSTINE Aaron A. 100% 99% 91% 64% 26% 5% -
100 KALIPERSAD Neil A. 100% 96% 67% 27% 5% - -
100 NICOLL James 100% 97% 77% 36% 7% - -
102 LOU Darren 100% 99% 91% 67% 32% 8% 1%
103 BADLANI Dev 100% 96% 74% 36% 8% 1% -
104 YU Jason 100% 99% 92% 70% 36% 10% 1%
105 DONG sean 100% 89% 52% 15% 1% - -
106 WANG Mason 100% 97% 75% 33% 7% 1% -
107 TRUBETSKI David 100% 96% 77% 40% 11% 1% -
108 SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden 100% 100% 94% 68% 29% 6% -
108 PLASTARAS Trey 100% 91% 55% 18% 3% - -
108 LU Xiao 100% 51% 12% 1% - - -
111 XU Ethan 100% 99% 87% 52% 14% 2% -
112 WECHSLER Jacob 100% 97% 78% 41% 12% 2% -
112 GAO William 100% 100% 99% 88% 46% 9% -
114 TRAUGOT Owen G. 100% 100% 97% 81% 47% 14% 1%
115 LI Lianhao 100% 86% 41% 9% 1% - -
116 LI Chenglang Ryan 100% 95% 72% 36% 11% 2% -
117 BAUMANN Gunnar 100% 50% 7% - - -
118 BAO Aaron 100% 100% 94% 71% 33% 7% 1%
119 NICOLL William 100% 88% 55% 22% 5% 1% -
120 ORTEGA Jose-Arnel 100% 99% 93% 67% 30% 7% 1%
121 MORGESON Colin 100% 59% 17% 2% - - -
122 REZA Farazi 100% 91% 58% 21% 3% - -
123 SCHREIBER Samuel S. 100% 82% 39% 9% 1% - -
124 ORLOV Dmitriy 100% 96% 70% 28% 5% - -
125 LI Jinghua E. 100% 99% 90% 59% 21% 3% -
126 SONG Austin 100% 88% 54% 20% 4% - -
127 GLEBA Nico 100% 83% 45% 14% 2% - -
128 DE JAGER Robert 100% 75% 26% 3% - - -
129 LIGOS Alex M. 100% 94% 58% 19% 3% - -
130 LIU Zixian (Aaron) 100% 100% 97% 79% 42% 10% 1%
131 GUO Justin 100% 98% 80% 40% 10% 1% -
132 LI Ayren 100% 95% 72% 36% 10% 1% -
133 PARK Joseph 100% 93% 59% 20% 3% - -
134 CAMPISI Joseph 100% 99% 85% 46% 9% 1% -
135 TANG Albert 100% 97% 76% 36% 8% 1% -
136 LEE Lukas 100% 99% 88% 56% 17% 2% -
137 ARCE Andrew W. 100% 60% 15% 1% - - -
137 XIE Buster 100% 90% 49% 13% 2% - -
139 FRANK Amir 100% 86% 46% 12% 1% - -
140 HUA Aiden 100% 78% 37% 10% 1% - -
141 MACDERMOTT Rowan 100% 99% 87% 56% 21% 4% -
142 DECORLETO III Andrew (Tripp) J. 100% 86% 46% 13% 2% - -
143 SIMA Congyu Josh 100% 98% 81% 42% 10% 1% -
144 ZHONG Guoren 100% 92% 61% 22% 4% - -
145 WANG Jackson 100% 99% 82% 44% 13% 2% -
146 JIA Jing Yu 100% 71% 26% 4% - - -
147 HUSSAIN Ibrahim 100% 96% 72% 26% 4% - -
148 KLOTZ Isaiah 100% 96% 71% 27% 5% - -
149 ZHOU Leon 100% 89% 57% 22% 5% - -
149 BALAKIRSKIY Gabriel 100% 61% 17% 2% - - -
151 GAO Payton 100% 94% 52% 12% 1% - -
152 PITERBARG Maxim 100% 92% 56% 18% 3% - -
152 HU Jason 100% 75% 30% 5% - - -
154 HOLCOMB Cedric 100% 32% 3% - - - -
155 LOGAN Kai 100% 96% 65% 13% 1% - -
156 YOON DYLAN 100% 85% 49% 17% 3% - -
157 PAN Henry 100% 89% 37% 4% - - -
158 HUANG Eythan 100% 87% 50% 15% 2% - -
159 UJSZASZI Ben 100% 77% 37% 10% 1% - -
160 WANG Winston 100% 81% 40% 10% 1% - -
161 LEWIS Nikhil I. 100% 45% 8% 1% - - -
161 BANG Ian 100% 28% 3% - - - -
163 AGRAWAL Niki 100% 68% 13% 1% - -
164 IVANENKO Alex 100% 39% 6% - - - -
165 HUSSAIN Ismail A. 100% 44% 8% 1% - - -
165 LIU Ryan 100% 80% 34% 6% 1% - -
165 MALHAM Andrew 100% 29% 3% - - - -
165 LIU Charles 100% 45% 8% 1% - - -
165 LU Guanxun (James) 100% 90% 53% 15% 2% - -
165 CHO Nathan 100% 86% 52% 19% 4% - -
171 ZHUANG Chuanxuan 100% 62% 19% 3% - - -
171 WEI Qian 100% 40% 7% 1% - - -
173 XU Dinghui Ryan 100% 46% 8% 1% - - -
174 POZO Matias 100% 84% 44% 11% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.