Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZAFFT Maximo S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% |
2 | JEON Alexander E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 11% |
3 | SILVER Cameron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 10% |
3 | WU Joseph | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 44% | 16% | 3% |
5 | YU Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 23% |
6 | ADLER Ian B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 30% | 7% |
7 | MOON Ryan Y. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
8 | SODERBERG Alex Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
9 | CANDELA Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
10 | ARLINGTON Nicholas J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
11 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
12 | MUNLIN Donovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
13 | JEONG Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 20% |
14 | CHONG christopher | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 64% | 30% | 7% |
15 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
16 | KUMAR Anitya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 32% | 8% |
17 | KUDRIAVTCEV Sergei | 100% | 99% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
18 | ROBINSON Riley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 26% |
19 | DELANEY Alexander D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% |
20 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
21 | ROY Joseph T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% | |
22 | LI Brian X | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | |
23 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
24 | JIN Alexander | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
25 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
26 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
27 | ALFAIATE Lucas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 66% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
28 | LIU John | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
29 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
30 | LUKANYUK Lorence | 100% | 96% | 78% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
31 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
32 | KIM Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
33 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 43% | 16% | 3% |
34 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 14% |
35 | INSLER Ethan C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 32% | 7% |
36 | SUVOROV Yuly | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 26% | 5% |
37 | LIEF Isaac R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
38 | CAI Brian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
39 | JOSEPH William | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
40 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
41 | SCHULTZ Alex | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 6% |
42 | KIM William M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
42 | MA Victor | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
42 | JIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
45 | HOLDERNESS Landon | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
46 | MARCHANT Albert J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
47 | CAI Kevin P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 9% |
48 | KARAUSKY Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
49 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 11% | |
50 | KILUK Andrew | 100% | 85% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
51 | CUMMINGS Kai | 100% | 94% | 73% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - |
52 | NIXON Christian A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 37% | 12% | 2% |
53 | HODGE Jaydon L. | 100% | 86% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
54 | SILVERS Noah E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
55 | LEE Seungwon | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
56 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
57 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
58 | NOWAK Jakub P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 64% | 31% | 7% |
59 | DOELEMAN zeno | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
60 | JAIN Sarthak | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
61 | KUCZAJDA Matthew | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - |
62 | DAVIS Scott | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
63 | JIN daniel | 100% | 93% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
64 | WICKBOLDT Eric | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
65 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
66 | O'HARA Keegan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 7% |
67 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
68 | YULE Alexander L. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
69 | BORATIN Daniel I. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
70 | LAWLER Aidan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
71 | STEVENS Daniel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 12% | 2% |
72 | YUROVCHAK Andrew T. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 9% | |
73 | KOKENGE Clark | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
74 | BEACH John | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
75 | MELCHER Jack H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
76 | CONKLIN Jim | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
77 | SMITH Justin C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
78 | WU Jason | 100% | 98% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | 1% |
79 | PERKINS-OLLILA Justin W. | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
80 | LEHR William D. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
81 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
82 | LEONE III Charles D. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
83 | CLARK Ethan J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
84 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | |
85 | ZHAO corey | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
86 | MADSEN Jr Eric W. | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
87 | ELLINGTON Keegan A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
88 | GAINES Aaron | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
89 | KIM Sterling S. | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
90 | MCDERMOTT Brian | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
91 | LEE Timothy S. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 46% | 17% | 3% |
92 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 19% | 4% | - |
93 | GREEN Ummi | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
94 | TARBUSKOVICH III John | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
95 | DUDLEY Logan M. | 100% | 85% | 51% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
95 | BARREIRO Darren | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
97 | LOGUE Ethan D. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
98 | MOTIR Lucas D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
98 | KIM Dylan J. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - |
100 | ROBERTS Samuel E. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
101 | CUMMINGS Atticus C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% |
102 | JAYENDRA Chandrashekar | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
103 | TIRRELL Justin J. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
104 | WEAVER Neil | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
105 | MAGDA Daniel | 100% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
106 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 100% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
107 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 19% | 4% | - |
108 | COMER Daniel T. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
109 | COHEN Jared E. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 37% | 12% | 2% |
109 | PARK Brian | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
109 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
109 | ZHAO Luhan | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
113 | PERSAUD Daivik | 100% | 80% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
114 | KIM Byung | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
115 | GREGORY Abram | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
116 | TREBON Hayden | 100% | 85% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
117 | WEISE Eli S. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
117 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 94% | 72% | 39% | 14% | 3% | - |
119 | NOP Will H. | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
120 | BLAKE Randall K. | 100% | 69% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
121 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
122 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | 100% | 69% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
122 | WELDON Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
124 | KAJI Ty | 100% | 93% | 68% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.