July Challenge & Parafencing Nat'l Championships

Cadet Men's Foil

Friday, July 23, 2021 at 8:30 AM

Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 UM Ethan A. - - 1% 8% 37% 54%
2 CHEN Andrew - - - 4% 23% 45% 28%
3 KAO Castor T. - - 1% 8% 26% 41% 24%
3 BAS Liam - - 1% 9% 27% 40% 23%
5 DESERANNO Jeidus - - - 1% 9% 36% 54%
6 BURKE Spencer W. - - 1% 9% 30% 41% 19%
7 BRUK Peter J. - 2% 11% 30% 36% 18% 2%
8 LIN Dashiell - 1% 13% 38% 39% 9%
9 KIM Nicholas W. - - - 3% 18% 46% 33%
10 FU Samuel Y. - 4% 22% 43% 27% 4%
11 ONIK Elijah T. - - 1% 7% 26% 43% 23%
12 LEE Aidan - - 3% 15% 36% 35% 11%
13 HOOSHI Dylan - - 4% 22% 46% 28%
14 JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) - 1% 8% 27% 40% 23%
14 GODZHIK Zachary 1% 9% 28% 38% 20% 4%
16 ZHANG Andy W. - - 4% 22% 46% 27%
17 DAI Jonathan T. - - 2% 13% 35% 36% 12%
18 HUTH Mitchell - - 1% 6% 23% 44% 26%
19 WONG Adam L. - - - 4% 19% 42% 35%
20 SONG Leonardo T. - 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 7%
21 WU Alexander - 2% 11% 32% 40% 16%
22 KWON Ethan - - 3% 16% 37% 33% 10%
23 LI Raphael C. - - 2% 12% 31% 38% 17%
24 CULLIVAN Justice - 2% 14% 38% 36% 10%
25 CHEN Allen - - 2% 14% 43% 41%
26 LIANG Lixi (Henry) - - 1% 7% 23% 41% 28%
27 KIM Yonjae - - 2% 13% 37% 37% 11%
28 OH Jonathan - 2% 11% 28% 36% 20% 3%
29 LUH Ethan K. 1% 10% 29% 36% 20% 5% -
30 SINGH Dayaal - - 4% 20% 44% 33%
31 YANG Luao - 1% 6% 24% 43% 27%
32 MARTIN IV Elmer D. 2% 12% 30% 33% 18% 4% -
33 CHIN Julian S. 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5%
34 LO Conrad - - - 1% 10% 36% 53%
35 BAE Kevin - 5% 17% 32% 30% 14% 2%
36 SHA Yi Peng - 1% 5% 19% 36% 30% 9%
37 BANERJEE ANUP - - 2% 13% 34% 37% 14%
38 TSAY Jeremy M. - 3% 15% 32% 33% 15% 2%
39 ZHOU Oscar J. 4% 20% 33% 28% 12% 2% -
40 GRAHAM Roy J. - 2% 13% 33% 38% 14%
41 JEON Caleb A. - - 1% 7% 28% 42% 22%
42 SICHITIU Alexander - 2% 12% 32% 37% 15% 2%
43 FUKUDA Alessio R. - 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 2%
44 WU Nicholas - - 1% 11% 35% 39% 14%
45 FUKUDA Renzo K. - - 3% 16% 36% 35% 10%
46 HOOSHI Jayden - 1% 6% 22% 36% 28% 7%
47 RUSADZE Nickolas - - 4% 17% 35% 33% 11%
48 ZHAI Jeffrey - 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1%
49 VAZQUEZ Zander 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 3%
50 CHENG Jonathan - 2% 16% 39% 34% 8%
51 JI Aidan Y. 8% 31% 36% 19% 5% 1% -
52 SUNG Chang-Han S. - 3% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2%
53 DOCTOR Aidan L. 1% 7% 27% 37% 22% 6% 1%
54 GONG Benjamin 1% 7% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1%
55 DANKAR Neel - 3% 13% 30% 33% 17% 3%
55 GATZA Logan 1% 11% 29% 34% 19% 5% -
57 YU Anders - 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 5%
58 GAO William 1% 10% 30% 37% 19% 4% -
59 WYMAN Julian 7% 28% 38% 21% 5% -
60 KHER Roan 8% 33% 40% 16% 3% -
61 LIN Michael 5% 22% 34% 26% 10% 2% -
62 FORTUNE Alexander J. 9% 28% 35% 21% 6% 1% -
63 BING Charles - 4% 16% 32% 31% 14% 2%
64 CORTRIGHT Joshua C. - 14% 36% 33% 13% 2% -
65 WOO Christian 5% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1% -
66 NAGER Noah 2% 14% 36% 35% 12% 1%
67 SIU Aiden 6% 27% 38% 23% 5% -
68 HOBSON Aaron K. 5% 24% 40% 25% 6% -
69 LI Richard - - - 4% 22% 47% 27%
70 DIERKS Kian - 5% 24% 39% 24% 6% 1%
71 PALMA Matthew Dominic 1% 7% 28% 40% 20% 4% -
72 GUO Sean 3% 18% 35% 29% 12% 2% -
73 ZHANG Jiening G. 16% 36% 31% 14% 3% - -
74 KIM Andrew J. 6% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
75 KALIPERSAD Neil A. 24% 49% 23% 4% - -
76 MURRAY Maximo 2% 14% 34% 34% 13% 2%
77 MEJIA MATTHEW D. 32% 42% 20% 4% - -
78 WU Jerry Z. 5% 24% 38% 26% 7% 1%
79 TSIMIKLIS Yanni 7% 25% 35% 24% 8% 1% -
80 LI Owen - 3% 14% 30% 33% 17% 3%
81 KEE Andrew L. - 5% 23% 38% 27% 8% 1%
82 ZHENG zhe 12% 40% 34% 12% 2% - -
83 KIM Jackson - 21% 42% 28% 8% 1% -
84 KIM Ryan Y. 4% 21% 38% 28% 9% 1% -
85 GUERRA Gabriel H. 6% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
86 SADOVSKY Leor B. 2% 15% 33% 32% 14% 3% -
87 TAN Christien 7% 32% 38% 19% 5% - -
88 WILLIAMS Connor J. 12% 33% 34% 17% 4% - -
89 PO Oliver 10% 30% 35% 19% 5% 1% -
90 LI Avery Peihong 7% 30% 40% 19% 4% - -
91 FOGELSON Frederick J. 1% 7% 24% 37% 25% 6%
92 SEAL Maximus R. 20% 43% 29% 7% 1% -
93 TANG Owen S. 2% 16% 42% 31% 8% 1%
94 REYES Omar 10% 34% 35% 17% 4% -
95 VALOUEV Aleksey 36% 43% 18% 3% - -
96 TAN Peter 24% 44% 25% 5% - -
97 WECHSLER Jacob 28% 42% 23% 6% 1% -
98 ZHEN Ethan 2% 12% 30% 33% 18% 4% -
98 KLOTZ Isaiah 11% 37% 37% 13% 2% - -
100 WONG Adrian - 5% 22% 36% 27% 8% 1%
101 NGUYEN William 93% 7% - - - - -
102 ELKOUSY Laith H. - 23% 42% 26% 7% 1% -
103 OH Jaden 11% 39% 35% 13% 2% - -
104 TRAUGOT Owen G. 1% 18% 38% 31% 11% 2% -
104 GONZALEZ Matthew 39% 43% 16% 2% - - -
106 NAM Michael 35% 42% 19% 4% - - -
106 CHAMBERS Eli 42% 41% 14% 2% - - -
108 LI Matthew 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1% -
109 GOGOI Vir K. 2% 17% 38% 31% 10% 1% -
110 BAEK David 29% 43% 22% 5% 1% -
111 BERNABE Rafael 28% 42% 23% 6% 1% - -
112 BERK Theodore 9% 34% 38% 16% 3% -
113 JIANG Owen 9% 32% 37% 18% 4% -
114 DINSAY Kristjan 32% 42% 20% 5% 1% - -
115 CHUANG Kian J. 15% 36% 32% 14% 3% - -
116 HSIAO Nicholas 41% 44% 13% 1% - -
117 NGUYEN Liam 53% 36% 9% 1% - - -
118 STRUGAR Marcus A. 1% 6% 21% 33% 27% 10% 1%
119 FARRELL Spencer 95% 5% - - - - -
120 KIM Harrison 46% 40% 12% 2% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.